LRRK2 in Focus: A Global Browser Linking Genetic Diversity to Functional Effects
Grant, S. M.; van Midden, V.; Fernandez-Toledo, E.; Cham, M.; Sammler, E.; Alessi, D.; The Global Parkinson's Genetics Program, ; Morris, H.; Blauwendraat, C.; Singleton, A. B.; Lange, L. M.
Show abstract
Background: LRRK2 variants are major contributors to Parkinsons disease (PD). Many pathogenic variants increase kinase activity, underscoring the value of functional assays in nominating therapeutic targets and kinase inhibitors as potential disease-modifying therapies. Objective: To develop an interactive resource that provides functional context and ancestry-specific variant frequencies. Methods: Genotyping and short-read sequencing data were analyzed for 101,678 individuals (61,709 PD, 39,969 controls) from the Global Parkinsons Genetics Program (GP2) and integrated with clinical and in-vitro biochemical kinase activity information. Results: The LRRK2 Browser (http://gp2.org/lrrk2browser) displays ancestry-specific genetic data for 19,596 LRRK2 variants (968 exonic, 14 disease-associated) across 11 populations, and functional data for 171 variants. Clinical annotations include age, age at onset, and family history of PD. Discussion: The publicly available LRRK2 Browser represents an open-access, multi-ancestry resource to support LRRK2 variant interpretation. It aims to enhance the translational potential of genetic and functional data for precision medicine and the implementation of gene-targeted therapies in diverse populations.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Large-scale genetic characterization of Parkinson’s disease in the African and African admixed populations 96%
- Genetic Analysis and Natural History of Parkinson’s Disease Due to the LRRK2 G2019S Variant 95%
- Heterozygous PRKN mutations are common but do not increase the risk of Parkinson’s disease 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.