Smarter, Shorter, Safer: Study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation of a behavioural intervention bundle to reduce antibiotic use in residential aged care
Raban, M. Z.; Urwin, R.; Rahman, B.; Silva, S. M.; Neupane, S.; Newell, B. R.; Lim, L.-l.; Wabe, N.; Li, L.; Arnolda, G.; Neupane, S.; Balmer, S.; Dunstan, T.; Pinto, S.; Thomas, V.; Westbrook, J.
Show abstract
Introduction The overuse and prolonged use of antibiotics in residential aged care (RAC) increases the risk of adverse effects and contributes to the global threat of antimicrobial resistance. Behavioural science-informed interventions have effectively reduced antibiotic prescribing in primary care but have rarely been implemented in RAC settings. We co-developed a behavioural science intervention bundle named Smarter, Shorter, Safer with RAC providers. We aim to assess the effectiveness of the intervention on rates of antibiotic use, measure effect persistence 6-months after the final intervention round, and investigate stakeholder experiences of the intervention. Methods and analysis We will conduct a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial with an embedded qualitative process evaluation. RAC homes (n=46) will be stratified into tertiles of baseline antibiotic use and randomly allocated to three intervention roll-out steps. Each RAC home will receive a bundled intervention consisting of social norm feedback, public commitment messaging and consumer information, staggered by step. Three rounds of the intervention will be delivered to each home at quarterly intervals. The primary outcome is antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 resident days (DOT/1000 days). Secondary outcomes are the percentage of antibiotic courses with a duration longer than guidelines and the percentage of residents on an antibiotic. Qualitative interviews will investigate staff and consumer experiences of the intervention bundle over time and by high, median and low baseline antibiotic use rates. Ethics and dissemination We obtained ethical approval from the Macquarie University Human Research Ethics Committee. Our findings will be disseminated through a range of forums including the publication of results in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences. Trial registration number Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12625001132437 (https://anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12625001132437.aspx)
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of 12 weeks of Multi-nutrient supplementation on the Immune and Musculoskeletal systems of Older Adults in Aged-Care (The Pomerium Study): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
- Implementation Science Protocol for a participatory, theory-informed implementation research programme in the context of health system strengthening in sub-Saharan Africa (ASSET-ImplementER) 94%
- Exploring how PRIME-Parkinson care is implemented and whether, how and why it produces change, for who and under what conditions: a protocol for an embedded process evaluation within the PRIME-UK randomised controlled trial 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Wellbeing Impact Study of High-Speed 2 (WISH2): Protocol for a mixed-methods examination of the impact of major transport infrastructure development on mental health and wellbeing 94%
- Investigating the use of a one-page infographic to improve recruitment and retention to the BASIL+ Randomised Controlled Trial: A Study Within a Trial (SWAT) 94%
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 risk factors amongst 14,786 care home residents: An observational longitudinal analysis including daily community positive test rates of COVID-19, hospital stays, and vaccination status in Wales (UK) between 1st September 2020 and 1st May 2021. 92%
- Changes in health and functioning of care home residents over two decades: what can we learn from population based studies? 92%
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 94%
- A complex ePrescribing-based Anti-Microbial Stewardship (ePAMS+) intervention for hospitals combining technological and behavioural components: protocol for a feasibility trial 94%
- A Health Navigator intervention to address the unmet social needs of caregivers of hospitalised children in South Australia: protocol for a mixed-methods pilot study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 92%
- Statistical Analysis Plan for the Stepped-wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Electronic Early Notification of Sepsis in Hospitalized Ward Patients (SCREEN): a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 91%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.