Back

APRIL: Adaptive Regression-Based Two-Dimensional Quantitative Anisotropy Imaging Using Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse

Hassan, M. W.; Crook, K.; Gi, Y. J.; Lee, J.; Hossain, M. M.

2026-07-01 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.30.735710 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop and validate a quantitative, depth-resolved anisotropy imaging framework that extends ARFI-based focal degree-of-anisotropy (DoA) estimation into two-dimensional mapping by modeling the depth-dependent relationship between shear modulus ratio (SMR) and peak displacement ratio (PDR). Methods: We propose APRIL (Adaptive Polynomial Regression for anisotropy Imaging via ARFI-induced DispLacements), a framework for quantitative, depth-resolved DoA imaging that adaptively selects polynomial regression or shape-preserving spline interpolation based on excitation PSF asymmetry. Training data were generated using an LS-DYNA3D + Field II simulation pipeline in homogeneous transversely isotropic media (SMR 0.9-4.9). Testing included shifted SMRs under varied acoustic conditions and three heterogeneous inclusion configurations (anisotropic inclusion in isotropic background and vice versa). Experimental validation was performed in an in-vivo murine tumor model over the time, ex-vivo chicken breast, and tissue-mimicking gelatin phantoms, using a Verasonics system with an L11-5v transducer. Results: APRIL achieved depth-resolved SMR prediction errors below 9% over 10-30 mm, with highest accuracy in the focal region (MAE 2.3%, RMSE < 0.1) and stable performance across PSF transition zones. In heterogeneous phantoms, it reconstructed anisotropy maps with SSIM up to 86% and MPE below 7%, accurately delineating inclusion boundaries. Under acoustic parameter variations, mean absolute errors remained below 10%, demonstrating robustness to system and tissue heterogeneity. Conclusion: APRIL enables robust, two-dimensional anisotropy imaging beyond focal estimates. Significance: The method provides a physically grounded and generalizable framework for clinically viable anisotropy biomarkers in muscle, tendon, kidney, tumor and breast tissues.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
40 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Photoacoustics
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.1%
4
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.2%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
8
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
Physics in Medicine & Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
13
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
15
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Optics Letters
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
17
Journal of Biomedical Optics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
20
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
21
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
22
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%