Back

The Listening Effort Profile of Eye Movements: Easy, Difficult, and Impossible Speech Comprehension

Herrmann, B.; Fink, L. K.; Pandey, P. R.; Johnsrude, I.; Ryan, J. D.

2026-07-03 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.30.735702 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Speech comprehension in noisy environments often requires cognitive effort, but listeners may disengage when comprehension becomes impossible. Eye movements have recently emerged as a promising new measure of listening effort, but it remains unclear whether eye movements are sensitive to the full effort profile across easy, difficult, and impossible speech comprehension. Across four experiments, participants listened to sentences at easy, difficult, and impossible levels of multi-talker background babble while pupil size and eye movements were recorded. Pupil size generally followed the expected inverted u-shaped effort profile: low for easy speech, maximal for difficult but still intelligible speech and lower again for impossible speech, although this pattern partly reflected sustained, condition-specific differences and not only sentence-evoked responses. Gaze dispersion - measuring the spread of eye movements - decreased with high temporal selectivity during difficult relative to easy and impossible speech, indicating reduced eye movements during active, effortful listening. However, gaze dispersion was also lower, but less temporally selective, during impossible compared to easy listening, especially in non-baseline-corrected analyses, suggesting that reduced eye movements do not index listening effort uniquely. Instead, eye movements appear to reflect both attentional engagement during difficult listening and disengagement or inward attention when meaningful listening is no longer possible. These findings indicate that pupil size and eye movements provide complementary indices of listening-related cognition, and highlight the integration of listening, cognition, and motor systems.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.6%
2
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.7%
4
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.5%
6
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
7
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
11
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
12
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
13
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
14
Hearing Research
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
15
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
16
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
17
Trends in Hearing
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
18
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
19
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
20
Ear & Hearing
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
21
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
23
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 38%
1.0%
25
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
Brain and Language
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
29
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%