Back

Dysregulation of pupal diapause in hybrid progenies, introgression and species delimitation within and beyond the Old World Swallowtail (Papilio machaon Linnaeus) butterfly complex

Michel, F. J.; Legal, L.; Kunte, K.; Descimon, H.

2026-07-03 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.30.735657 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In search of recurrent patterns of postzygotic hybrid incompatibility, we investigated the Holarctic 'Old World Swallowtail' (Papilio machaon Linnaeus) butterfly complex, whose members can easily be crossed in the laboratory. How many species this model system comprises remains unclear, as taxa with highly distinctive larvae but uncertain status come into contact with authentic P. machaon subspecies in Southern parts of the Palearctic region. By determining mitochondrial and ITS2 haplotypes within and away from contact zones, we found that these neighboring populations do exchange genes, as expected from F1 hybrids being generally fertile in our laboratory crosses. Nevertheless, recurrent instances of dysregulation of diapause were uncovered in hybrid progenies. In keeping with Haldane's Rule, pupae of the heterogametic (female) sex were either unable to enter diapause or, in reciprocal crosses, unable to resume development after having initiated diapause, whereas F1 males experienced normal, photoperiod-regulated diapause, but passed on abnormal diapause regulation to part of their female offspring when backcrossed. Comparing male and female pupal weights in hybrid progenies provides estimates of parental incompatibility that allow to rank taxa and predict quantitatively the outcome of additional crosses, as expected if the same regulatory system were involved. A survey of the entomological literature confirms that diapausing pupae that cannot resume development ('perpetual nymphs') are a recurrent feature of interspecific lepidopteran crosses. Moreover, of the two parent species of a perpetual nymph, the paternal one generally has fewer broods per year. These observations are discussed in the light of models of the speciation process.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.8%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.4%
3
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.2%
4
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
110 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
6
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
8
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
10
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
12
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
13
Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
17
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%