Back

Head-to-head organized segmental paralogs AtOFP2 and AtOFP17 exhibit differential, spatio-temporal partitioning of function, and negative regulation of multiple developmental traits including seed-yield and root architecture

Chahar, N.; Pokhriyal, E.; Yadav, S.; Ren, B.; Dangwal, M.; Das, S.

2026-07-09 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.30.735610 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ovate Family Proteins (OFPs) are a class of plant-specific, negative nuclear transcriptional regulators characterized by conserved C-terminal OVATE domain. This study on comparative functional characterization of two head-to-head arranged OFPs - AtOFP2 (Ovate-OFP with full ovate domain) and AtOFP17 (Ovate-Like OFP with partial ovate domain) provides critical insight into how structural variations in ovate domain leads to functional divergence. Detailed phenotypic analysis of 28 physical and physiological traits of loss- and gain-of-function mutants revealed that both genes act as broad, pleotropic repressors of plant growth and development. Removal of repression in knock-down mutants of both genes exhibited reduced duration of seed dormancy, faster rate of germination and growth, bigger plants and significantly higher seed yield. In contrast, constitutive over-expression showed a generalized repressive nature of both genes, with nuanced differences for fine tuning of specific traits. For example, both genes showed antagonistic behaviours on root hair architecture. AtOFP2 act as a strong repressor of root hair development whereas AtOFP17 is a stronger repressor of hypocotyl and root cell architecture. AtOFP17 owing to partial ovate domain exerts a mild level of repression throughout life span as indicated by smaller plants and lesser yield in knock-down AtOFP17 mutants. On the contrary, AtOFP2 exerted a much stronger repressor effect in which > 90% over-expression mutants died at the juvenile stage ; the survival of remaining 10% is probably owing to activation of dosage-dependent feedback loop mechanism as indicated by normal growth of mature plants, and is also evident by transcriptome data. Transcriptome analysis of roots of 7-day old seedling of knock-down and over-expression mutants of AtOFP2 showed downregulation of OFP2 in over-expressed mutants. However, severely stunted phenotype indicated presence of stable OFP2 protein to exert effects. Analysis of DEGs in OFP2 mutants revealed that it acts as an important regulator working at intersection of hormonal signalling affecting critical genes required for auxin, cytokinin, GA, BR and ABA functioning. Perturbations across hormonal signalling pathways affects cell wall remodelling factors such as EXPANSINS, Xyloglucan hydrolases (XTHs) and cellulose synthases (CSLs) causing overall stunted growth; and epidermal patterning genes such as WER, GL1, EGL3, TTG1 leading to severely reduced root length and root hairs. Significantly, functional analysis of this master regulator highlighted a significant economic potential. Knockdown of both these genes relieves their natural repression on reproductive traits, leading to longer siliques, bigger and heavier seeds, and substantially increased overall seed yield, positioning AtOFP2 and AtOFP17 as highly valuable targets for agricultural crop improvement.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.4%
2
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.1%
6
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.7%
7
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Gene Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
15
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
17
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
18
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
20
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
23
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
24
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
27
Plant Stress
12 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Plant and Cell Physiology
52 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
29
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Plant Cell Reports
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%