Back

Novel quantitative trait loci conferring broad-based resistance to root-knot nematodes in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus)

Tajima, A. M.; Matthews, W. C.; Duong, T.; Khanh, T. D.; Baniya, A.; Penmetsa, R. V.; Parker, T.; Farmer, A.; English, S.; Diepenbrock, C.; Gepts, P.; Roberts, P. A.; Huynh, B.-L.

2026-07-09 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.30.735594 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) is a broadly adapted, economically important leguminous crop and a susceptible host of root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.; RKN), which are a devastating plant pathogen in agricultural systems worldwide. To date, there have been few studies to elucidate the genetic determinants of RKN resistance in lima beans. Understanding the genetic mechanisms underlying resistance is essential for improving resistance traits and incorporating them into lima bean breeding programs. To assist in marker-assisted selection, we aimed to identify and map quantitative trait loci (QTLs) conferring RKN resistance-related traits. Three recombinant inbred line (RIL) populations were used in this study. Three populations were derived by crossing two RKN-resistant parents with the same RKN-susceptible parent and with each other. All populations were genotyped using genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers. Each population was screened for root galling (RG) and RKN egg reproduction (ER) in response to M. incognita and M. javanica in greenhouse experiments. Three major QTLs were detected and mapped on chromosome Pl04 (QRk-pl04.1), Pl05 (QRk-pl05.1) and Pl10 (QRk-pl10.1) across populations. Among them, QRk-pl05.1 and QRk-pl10.1 affected levels of RG and ER of both RKN species, while QRk-pl04.1 suppressed root galling and reproduction responses of M. incognita but not of M. javanica. These chromosomal regions defined by flanking markers will help guide marker-assisted breeding and gene discovery for broad-based RKN resistance in lima beans.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
18.3%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
12.4%
3
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
4
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.2%
5
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
7
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
8
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
10
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
Plant Disease
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
13
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
14
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
17
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
25
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%