Back

Delaying the onset of aided target recognition highlights allows for a more dispersed allocation of overt attention

Callahan-Flintoft, C.; Larkin, G. B.

2026-07-06 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.06.30.735590 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Visual search is a critical component of many professions such as military operations, baggage screening, and radiology. Aided Target Recognition (AiTR) systems are designed to highlight potential threats across the operator visual field in real-time, directing attention and improving accuracy. However, these systems may impact search and, consequently, situational awareness by diverting attentional resources from non-highlighted, yet relevant, locations. Previous work suggests that scene gist is extracted within the first 250 ms of scene onset (Vo & Henderson, 2010). As such, this study examined whether a 250 ms AiTR onset delay could encourage a more even distribution of attention. Participants searched synthetically generated scenes and classified each person in the scene as armed or unarmed. Depending on their condition, participants either saw the scenes unaugmented (No AiTR condition), with AiTR highlights consisting of red bounding boxes around armed people and yellow boxes around unarmed (AiTR condition), or with AiTR highlights presented 250 ms post scene onset (Delayed AiTR condition). A surprise memory test of background objects presented in the search scenes was administered to all participants upon completion of the search task. As predicted and preregistered, results showed less overt attentional deployment to background information (anything other than the people themselves) in the AiTR condition compared to No AiTR , however, decreased overt attentional deployment was not seen in the Delayed AiTR group. A similar pattern was observed in the memory data (with the AiTR condition having a lower score than the No AiTR condition and the Delayed AiTR condition), this difference was not significant.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.7%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.1%
3
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
4
Experimental Brain Research
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
5
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.3%
9
Behavior Research Methods
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
10
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
11
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
12
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.8%
13
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.1%
21
Consciousness and Cognition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
26
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%
29
Behavioural Processes
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
30
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%