Pediatric Hypertension Gaps: Longitudinal Analysis and Social Drivers of Health
Zaidi, A. H.; Rehmeyer, N.; Sood, E.; de Ferranti, S. D.; Sai Prashanthi, G.; Brewer, B. C.; Campbell, K.; Lopes, J.; Witherell, C.; Miller, J.; Kazak, A.
Show abstract
Background: Pediatric hypertension (HTN) remains underdiagnosed despite established guidelines. Prior studies evaluating social drivers of health (SDOH) relied on diagnostic codes or single-visit blood pressure (BP) measurements, limiting identification of persistent BP elevation. We evaluated longitudinal BP patterns and associated SDOH among children with continuity of care. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 6-17 years with [≥]3 primary care visits between 2017 and 2024 within a large healthcare network. BP was classified according to guidelines. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated associations between persistent abnormal BP ([≥]3 abnormal readings, would meet guideline-based diagnosis for HTN) and stage 1/2 HTN with demographic, clinical, and neighborhood-level factors, including Area Deprivation Index (ADI), Child Opportunity Index (COI), and insurance instability. Results: Among 71,683 children, 2,911 (4.2%) had persistent abnormal BP, whereas only 848 (1.2%) had a documented HTN diagnosis. Obesity, age [≥]13 years, male sex, prematurity, and insurance instability were associated with abnormal BP and stage 1/2 HTN. Higher ADI quartiles were associated with increased odds of abnormal BP (Q3: OR 2.48) and stage 1/2 HTN (Q3: OR 4.89). Higher COI socioeconomic opportunity was associated with lower odds of abnormal BP, whereas higher educational opportunity was associated with higher odds; these associations were not observed for stage 1/2 HTN. Conclusions: Among children with continuity of care, substantial gaps in HTN recognition persist despite repeated opportunities for diagnosis. SDOH factors remained associated with BP abnormalities, supporting the need for system-level and community-based strategies to improve HTN detection.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 95%
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 94%
- Evolving patterns of prevalence and management of hypertension phenotypes in Mexico: A two-decade analysis of nationally representative surveys 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Within-visit Blood Pressure Variability in Children and Adolescents in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2013-2020) 97%
- Factors Associated with Treatment-Resistant Hypertension: Results of a prospective observational Study 94%
- Differences between brachial and aortic blood pressure in adolescence and their impact on classification of hypertension 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence of Cardiovascular-Kidney-Metabolic Stages in US Adolescents and Relationship to Social Determinants of Health 94%
- High amino-acid intake in early life is associated with systolic but not diastolic arterial hypertension at 5-years of age in children born very preterm 93%
- Joint associations of pregnancy complications and postpartum maternal renal biomarkers with severe cardiovascular morbidities: A US racially diverse prospective birth cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Alpha globin gene copy number and hypertension risk among Black Americans 95%
- Assessing the impact of community-based interventions on hypertension and diabetes management in three Minnesota communities: findings from the prospective evaluation of US HealthRise programs 93%
- Hemodynamic Differences Between Women and Men with Elevated Blood Pressure in China 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.