Back

A Wearable Plantar Pressure System for Early Warning of Freezing of Gait Based on Time-Frequency and State-Space Modeling

Yuan, Y.; Li, W.; Zhu, L.; Su, H.; Yu, H.; Wang, H.; Lin, G. N.

2026-07-01 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356907 medRxiv
Show abstract

Freezing of gait (FoG) in Parkinson's disease is a brief but hazardous gait failure that often precedes falls. For wearable cueing or other closed-loop assistance, a detector that reacts only after FoG onset is usually too late; the more useful task is to recognize the pre-freezing transition from physiological signals. This study presents PreFoGNet, a dual time-frequency deep learning framework for early FoG prediction using plantar pressure signals. The temporal stream combines a multi-scale Inception encoder with a bidirectional Mamba module to capture both short contact-related transients and several-second gait deterioration without the quadratic cost of attention. In parallel, the frequency stream uses band-wise spectral modeling and attention-based gating to emphasize physiologically meaningful changes in the locomotion, freeze-related, and high-frequency bands. On the WearGait-PD dataset, with a 2 s prediction horizon and subject-wise evaluation, PreFoGNet achieved a sensitivity of 93.94%, a specificity of 89.76%, a G-Mean of 0.9183, and an AUC-ROC of 0.9607. It outperformed classical machine-learning and deep learning baselines, and retained usable performance under moderate noise and single-channel loss. Additional horizon analysis showed that plantar pressure contains a stable pre-freezing signature within 0-3 s before onset, with a practical prediction boundary of approximately 6-7 s. These findings suggest that time-frequency modeling of plantar pressure is a promising signal-processing route for wearable FoG early-warning systems.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.