Back

Design and implementation of maternal-infant clinical trial recruitment alert using linked electronic medical records, and evaluation of researcher-perceived alert usability

Panganiban, H. P.; Segal, A.; Kuschel, C.

2026-07-10 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356791 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background Clinical decision support systems configured as electronic medical records alerts can support clinical trial recruitment by identifying eligible participants. While they are typically used to evaluate a single patient record, their application for a linked maternal infant chart has not been extensively explored. Objective This project aimed to design and implement a clinical trial alert using linked maternal infant records and to evaluate researchers perceived usability. Materials and Methods We conducted a two phase quality assurance project: (1) design and implementation of an alert aligned with the anticipated recruitment workflow, and (2) evaluation of usability using the System Usability Scale. Basic content analysis described the alert design and implementation processes, while quantitative scoring assessed perceived usability. Results Over a 12 month period, only one alert was triggered due to changes in the recruitment workflow. Two silent alerts assessed maternal eligibility in outpatient and infant eligibility in inpatient settings. Three of four researchers completed the survey, yielding a score of 92.5, indicating excellent usability. Conclusion Although the alert was technically functional and perceived to have excellent usability, its performance was limited by deviations from the intended recruitment workflow. Researcher engagement and recruitment workflow alignment emerged as critical factors influencing alert utility. Clinical trial alerts for linked maternal infant records can be designed and implemented with excellent usability; however, consistent adherence to the recruitment workflow is essential. Broader application in additional study settings is recommended.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.2%
2
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.6%
3
JMIR Research Protocols
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.7%
5
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.7%
7
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
8
DIGITAL HEALTH
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.9%
9
BMC Medical Research Methodology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
10
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
12
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
13
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
14
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
15
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.1%
16
JMIR Medical Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
18
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
19
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
21
Clinical Trials
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
22
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
24
BMJ
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%