Protocol for the 2026 Nationwide Survey of Dementia Specialists on the Real-World Implementation of Anti-Amyloid Antibody Therapies in Japan: Clinical Practice, Blood Biomarkers, and Preference Experiments
Sato, K.; Niimi, Y.; Nakashima, S.; Igarashi, A.; Iwata, A.; Kasuga, K.; Nemoto, K.; Higashi, S.; Awata, S.; Ikeda, M.; Ikeuchi, T.; Iwatsubo, T.; Arai, T.
Show abstract
Background: Anti-amyloid antibody therapies have changed the clinical pathway for early Alzheimer disease (AD). Lecanemab and donanemab are now clinically available in many countries, including Japan, and their use requires biomarker confirmation, repeated magnetic resonance imaging monitoring, management of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, infusion capacity, staff resources, and shared decision-making. In Japan, these treatments are provided under the universal public health insurance system and are regulated by the optimal use guidelines. Therefore, it is important to understand not only the number of treated patients but also how specialists perceive clinical, logistical, and policy challenges in routine practice. Objective: This paper describes the protocol for a nationwide anonymous online survey of dementia specialists in Japan. The survey aims to evaluate the real-world implementation of anti-amyloid antibody therapies, including current clinical practice, facility readiness, perceived barriers, possible policy solutions, and physician preferences assessed using a discrete choice experiment and best-worst scaling. Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional, anonymous online survey using Google Forms. The survey targets board-certified specialists of the Japanese Society for Dementia Research and the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, with a main focus on physicians who have completed the official training course required for anti-amyloid antibody therapy. The questionnaire includes items on respondent and facility characteristics, perceived value of treatment, treatment experience, diagnostic and eligibility assessment, amyloid and APOE testing, MRI monitoring, infusion capacity, continued-administration facilities, blood-based biomarkers, preclinical AD, a discrete choice experiment, and best-worst scaling. Among respondents routed to the DCE section, the discrete choice experiment asks respondents to choose between hypothetical anti-amyloid antibody treatment profiles for early AD, defined by expected efficacy, risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities requiring treatment interruption or discontinuation, treatment duration, visit frequency, waiting time, and monthly out-of-pocket cost. Best-worst scaling evaluates the relative importance of policy and system-level solutions. Results: Data collection started on June 3, 2026, and is planned to close on June 30, 2026. This protocol was prepared before data lock and before any outcome analyses. The main results will be reported after data cleaning and analysis according to the prespecified analysis plan. Conclusions: This protocol describes a nationwide survey designed to clarify clinical, logistical, and policy challenges in the implementation of anti-amyloid antibody therapies in Japan. By publishing the survey design and analysis plan before data lock, this study aims to improve transparency and interpretability. The findings will help identify where Japanese dementia specialists perceive bottlenecks in diagnosis, biomarker testing, safety monitoring, infusion delivery, continued administration, and reimbursement. They may also inform policy discussions on APOE testing, blood-based biomarkers, regional care coordination, and service reimbursement for anti-amyloid antibody therapy.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Returning Research Results That Indicate Risk of Alzheimer Disease Dementia to Healthy Participants in Longitudinal Studies (WeSHARE) 95%
- The New Therapeutics in Alzheimer’s Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol 93%
- Developing a core outcome set for interventions in people with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Top-funded digital health companies offering lifestyle interventions for dementia prevention: Company overview and evidence analysis 93%
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 93%
- Identifying incident dementia by applying machine learning to a very large administrative claims dataset 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: an international consensus 95%
- Use of Lecanemab and Donanemab in the Canadian Healthcare System: Evidence, Challenges, and Areas for Future Research 93%
- Using Machine Learning and Electronic Health Record (EHR) Data for the Early Prediction of Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Dementias 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Qualitative Study of People with Alzheimer’s Disease in a Memory Clinic Considering Lecanemab Treatment 93%
- Non-pharmaceutical interventions for persons living with young-onset dementia and their informal caregivers: a systematic review with meta-analysis 93%
- Towards the development of a management protocol for Subjective Cognitive Decline: insights from a cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of multimodal clinical data 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.