Back

Protocol for the 2026 Nationwide Survey of Dementia Specialists on the Real-World Implementation of Anti-Amyloid Antibody Therapies in Japan: Clinical Practice, Blood Biomarkers, and Preference Experiments

Sato, K.; Niimi, Y.; Nakashima, S.; Igarashi, A.; Iwata, A.; Kasuga, K.; Nemoto, K.; Higashi, S.; Awata, S.; Ikeda, M.; Ikeuchi, T.; Iwatsubo, T.; Arai, T.

2026-07-01 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.30.26356494 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Anti-amyloid antibody therapies have changed the clinical pathway for early Alzheimer disease (AD). Lecanemab and donanemab are now clinically available in many countries, including Japan, and their use requires biomarker confirmation, repeated magnetic resonance imaging monitoring, management of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities, infusion capacity, staff resources, and shared decision-making. In Japan, these treatments are provided under the universal public health insurance system and are regulated by the optimal use guidelines. Therefore, it is important to understand not only the number of treated patients but also how specialists perceive clinical, logistical, and policy challenges in routine practice. Objective: This paper describes the protocol for a nationwide anonymous online survey of dementia specialists in Japan. The survey aims to evaluate the real-world implementation of anti-amyloid antibody therapies, including current clinical practice, facility readiness, perceived barriers, possible policy solutions, and physician preferences assessed using a discrete choice experiment and best-worst scaling. Methods: This is a prospective, cross-sectional, anonymous online survey using Google Forms. The survey targets board-certified specialists of the Japanese Society for Dementia Research and the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society, with a main focus on physicians who have completed the official training course required for anti-amyloid antibody therapy. The questionnaire includes items on respondent and facility characteristics, perceived value of treatment, treatment experience, diagnostic and eligibility assessment, amyloid and APOE testing, MRI monitoring, infusion capacity, continued-administration facilities, blood-based biomarkers, preclinical AD, a discrete choice experiment, and best-worst scaling. Among respondents routed to the DCE section, the discrete choice experiment asks respondents to choose between hypothetical anti-amyloid antibody treatment profiles for early AD, defined by expected efficacy, risk of amyloid-related imaging abnormalities requiring treatment interruption or discontinuation, treatment duration, visit frequency, waiting time, and monthly out-of-pocket cost. Best-worst scaling evaluates the relative importance of policy and system-level solutions. Results: Data collection started on June 3, 2026, and is planned to close on June 30, 2026. This protocol was prepared before data lock and before any outcome analyses. The main results will be reported after data cleaning and analysis according to the prespecified analysis plan. Conclusions: This protocol describes a nationwide survey designed to clarify clinical, logistical, and policy challenges in the implementation of anti-amyloid antibody therapies in Japan. By publishing the survey design and analysis plan before data lock, this study aims to improve transparency and interpretability. The findings will help identify where Japanese dementia specialists perceive bottlenecks in diagnosis, biomarker testing, safety monitoring, infusion delivery, continued administration, and reimbursement. They may also inform policy discussions on APOE testing, blood-based biomarkers, regional care coordination, and service reimbursement for anti-amyloid antibody therapy.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.8%
4
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.2%
5
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
48 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.5%
6
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.8%
8
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
12
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
13
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 71%
1.0%
15
npj Aging
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
16
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
18
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
BMC Geriatrics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
23
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%