Back

Calibration standards and sensitivity limits for fluorescence measurements with the Chi.Bio open-source bioreactor platform

Sambruna, A.; Tallarico, G.; Cosentino Lagomarsino, M.

2026-07-09 systems biology
10.64898/2026.06.29.735387 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Automated platforms such as Chi.Bio enable simultaneous monitoring of optical density and fluorescent reporter expression in 20 ml reactor cultures with controllable pump systems. As such, they provide an appealing option for contemporary gene expression quantification, quantitative physiology, and laboratory evolution and ecology experiments. While optical density calibration for this device is well established, no equivalent calibration framework exists for fluorescence, making quantitative comparison with reference instruments unreliable. Here, we characterize Chi.Bio fluorescence capabilities using fluorescent calibration microspheres and fixed GFP-expressing S. cerevisiae and E. coli cells, compared with orthogonal plate-reader measurements. We show that microsphere fluorescence is detectable and scales linearly with concentration, whereas the GFP signal from both species falls below the device detection limit. Comparison of background-correction strategies indicates that direct subtraction of a non-fluorescent control measured within the same device yields more reliable fluorescence estimates than the commonly used on-line normalization method. Knowledge of these sensitivity boundaries of the device provides practical guidelines for experimental design of future studies.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.2%
2
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
3
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
4
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
5
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
6
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.8%
8
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.8%
9
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
11
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.4%
13
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
14
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
15
Biotechnology Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
16
Algal Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
17
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
18
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
19
Metabolic Engineering Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.1%
21
BMC Biotechnology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
HardwareX
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
23
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Metabolic Engineering
75 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
25
Yeast
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
26
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
27
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
28
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.6%