Back

The Effect of Depriving the Aedes aegypti Mosquito of Natural Levels of Radiation

Goodale, L.; Thawng, C.; Hansen, I.; Smith, G.

2026-07-03 genetics
10.64898/2026.06.29.735377 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Organisms have spent their life histories exposed to background levels of natural ionizing radiation. To document the role that radiation plays, the deprivation of these natural levels has been studied by incubating organisms in the shielded space of underground laboratories. We report here on two studies (Study I and Study II) using Aedes aegypti for the first time as a model organism incubated 655 meters underground at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) outside of Carlsbad, New Mexico, U.S.A. Male mosquitos were incubated at the surface exposed to natural background radiation, and were compared to two underground treatments in which incubators were supplemented with radiation sources used to mimic background and these groups were compared to the underground, radiation-deprived treatment. In Study I, the mosquitos incubated underground in the absence of natural radiation had higher levels of mortality compared to those incubated at the surface and PCA plots of the two transcriptomes were clearly differentiated. Study II was conducted the following year and the experiment was narrowed to include only the surface control and underground, radiation-deprived treatment which allowed for four biological replicates. Again, there was a higher level of mortality in the mosquitos grown underground compared mosquitos grown at the surface. Transcriptomes were not as clearly differentiated by PCA analysis and fecundity data were similar between the two groups. Functional analysis of transcriptomic DEGs from two independent studies suggested there are stress responses in radiation deprived mosquitoes. The absence of a secondary stressor in Study II is discussed as an explanation for the transcriptome differences in the two experiments.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 1%
45.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.9%
4
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
5
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
6
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
7
Photochemistry and Photobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
9
BMC Neuroscience
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
10
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
11
Biology
45 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
12
Biogerontology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
13
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
14
Applied Sciences
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
17
Parasites & Vectors
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
18
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.7%
19
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
21
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
23
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
24
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%