Ang2 and TAT targeting of leptomeningeal disease by the intravenous and intrathecal routes: a comparative analysis

Leptomeningeal disease (LD), involving the metastasis of cells to the leptomeningeal membranes in the central nervous system (CNS), can be a deadly complication of several different types of cancer originating in the periphery or CNS, including breast cancer (BC) and pediatric medulloblastoma (MB). Targeted therapy represents a promising new approach to improve overall survival for LD patients. To this date, angiopep-2 (Ang2) and transactivating transcriptional activator (TAT), two well-known peptides for their brain delivery capability, have been reported to transport therapeutic cargos into the CNS for treatment of disease. Current administration strategies, however, still rely on oral delivery or intravenous injection (IV), where the substances need to travel through complex biological barriers to reach the subarachnoid space (SAS), which is the primary location of LD. Our research group has focused on the intrathecal (IT) route of administration as an alternative approach that can potentially enable high exposure of drug to CSF exposed tissues. However, there is a major field gap in understanding how targeting peptides can access (or not access) LD as a function of their route of administration. Therefore, our work was focused on comparing the targeting capability of Ang2 vs TAT by IT vs IV routes of administration. We first generated two xenograft models of LD by directly infusing breast cancer cells (MDA-MB231) or medulloblastoma cells (HDMB03) into the SAS via intracisternal magna injection (ICM) to form BC-LD and MB-LD models, respectively. These tumor models were characterized for overall survival, tumor growth patterns, and presence of hydrocephalus. Second, we further administered fluorescently labeled Ang2 or TAT peptides either IV or ICM into tumor bearing mice. Neuraxial fluorescence images were examined to evaluate the targeting ability of these two peptides based on colocalization between peptide signal and tumor tissues ex vivo. We discovered that the median survival of both models was negatively related to the number of the cells infused. While HDMB03 cells tended to metastasize preferentially to the brain region, MDA-MB231 cells tended to metastasize preferentially to the spinal cord. Both models present hydrocephalus as one of the common clinical symptoms in LD patients. Compared to the healthy control, MB-LD yielded a 7.3-fold increase and BC-LD a 26.5-fold increase in ventricular volume. Furthermore, targeting achieved by TAT was significantly higher than targeting achieved by Ang2 in thoracic spine for the MB-LD model. For BC-LD model, TAT signal was found to be significantly higher than Ang2 signal in the olfactory bulbs, brain stem, thoracic spine, and lumbar spine regions. While both peptides showed a strong signal at 2 hours post ICM injection, signal was not detectable 24 hours after administration, reflecting washout or degradation. Significantly, these data provide evidence that ICM will be a preferable route of administration over IV for the purpose of maximally targeting LD.