Back

Associations of waterbirds with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields: increasing foraging opportunities or just gathering for the feast?

Paulino, J.; Granadeiro, J. P.; Correia, E.; Catry, T.

2026-06-29 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.29.735228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Surges in food availability create localized but intense foraging opportunities, often attracting multi-species consumer groups. Agricultural practices can trigger these surges, prompting bird associations. However, the strength and duration of the association, as well as its drivers, remain unclear. This study examines waterbird association with harvesting and ploughing events in rice fields. The duration and magnitude of these associations were determined and three hypotheses addressed to explain them: (1) increased food availability, (2) enhanced foraging success and (3) reduced time allocated to vigilance. Waterbird counts and GPS tracking revealed strong associations with management events. Bird numbers spiked during events but declined within one to two days. Food availability (and soil penetrability) increased significantly during events - crayfish and rice during harvesting, worms and soil penetrability during ploughing - supporting Hypothesis 1. However, this did not improve foraging performance (intake rate, foraging success), rejecting Hypothesis 2. Higher competition, interference or kleptoparasitism in these large mixed-species flocks may offset increased food availability benefits. Alternatively, functional responses of target species may limit prey intake due to physiological or behavioural constraints. Hypothesis 3 was also unsupported, as birds did not reduce vigilance. It is plausible that birds may be drawn to events by the perception of a feast, not actual benefits. Gregariousness and foraging behaviour by local enhancement may explain such associations. Results highlight the complexity of bird responses to food surges while suggesting waterbirds in rice fields maintain stable foraging performance during agricultural management events and otherwise, indicating resilience to agricultural timing shifts.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 2%
40.1%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.6%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.4%
5
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
6
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.8%
8
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
9
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
11
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
12
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
14
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
15
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
18
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
Insect Conservation and Diversity
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
21
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Ecological Entomology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
24
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%
26
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.6%