Back

An MRI Atlas of Regional Brain Vulnerability to Metastatic Disease

Turner, J. I.; Arias, A.; Fu, A.; Oermann, E. K.; Kondiolka, D.

2026-07-01 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356888 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objectives: Are some brain regions intrinsically more vulnerable to metastatic colonization? We sought to characterize the spatial distribution of brain metastases and determine whether regional patterns vary according to primary tumor origin. Methods: We analyzed baseline MRI scans and expert tumor segmentations from 906 patients with 3,492 brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. Lesions were normalized to MNI152 standard space and superimposed to generate probabilistic atlases of metastatic occurrence. Regional metastatic burden was quantified using anatomical and vascular atlases. Spatial distributions were additionally compared between lung cancer and melanoma metastases. Results: Metastatic burden was distributed nonuniformly throughout the brain. The cerebellum demonstrated the strongest enrichment relative to its anatomical volume (fold change 1.61, p < 0.001), accompanied by overrepresentation of the vertebrobasilar circulation (fold change 1.49, p < 0.001). Spatial distribution also varied by primary tumor type. Lung cancer metastases demonstrated greater infratentorial involvement than melanoma metastases (16.6% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.05), with a corresponding increase in cerebellar burden (14.8% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.05), whereas melanoma metastases were relatively concentrated within the frontal lobe (37.7% vs. 24.6%, p < 0.01). Infratentorial enrichment was observed across all carcinoma subgroups, with the greatest enrichment seen in gastrointestinal metastases (32.9% infratentorial). Conclusion: Brain metastases exhibit nonrandom spatial distributions, with preferential involvement of posterior and infratentorial structures. Regional patterns vary according to primary tumor origin, supporting the existence of region-specific vulnerability to metastatic disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neuro-Oncology Advances
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.3%
2
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
3
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.9%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
6
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
7
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.5%
10
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
12
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
13
Neuro-Oncology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
14
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.2%
15
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
16
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Journal of Neuroscience Research
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
20
Radiotherapy and Oncology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
21
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
22
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%