Creating Equity? A Process Evaluation of Jamkesus Disabilitas, A Disability-Focused Health Financing Scheme in Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Azizatunnisa', L.; Kuper, H.; Probandari, A.; Banks, L. M.
Show abstract
Background This study aims to explore the initiation and implementation of Jamkesus Disabilitas, a health financing scheme for people with disabilities in Yogyakarta Province, using the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Process Evaluation for Complex Intervention. Methods We interviewed 19 people with disabilities with different types of impairment as beneficiaries, 3 people from Organisations for People with Disabilities (OPDs), 4 government officials, and 4 health providers, either in person, online, or by phone. Interviews were conducted by LA, and took place in Yogyakarta Province in July-September 2024. Data were analysed using a thematic analysis approach using NVivo 15 software. Findings Jamkesus Disabilitas has improved access to assistive technology (AT) and demonstrated inclusive care through its one-stop service. It also highlights the importance of consistent leadership in disability-inclusive health systems. However, challenges persist, including uneven AT quality, low coverage, limited availability, and inadequate data for evaluation and planning persisted. Moreover, the absence of inclusive features in the regular service means the scheme has not fully closed the equity gap in healthcare access for people with disabilities. Conclusion Jamkesus Disabilitas has expanded access to AT overlooked by the national health insurance (JKN). However, implementation should prioritise AT quality standards, financial and operational sustainability, and stronger data systems. Broader systemic reforms are also needed to embed disability inclusive practices in regular healthcare service delivery. Keywords Health equity, inclusive health system, social protection, health insurance, health financing
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- By the numbers and in their own words: A mixed methods study of unmet needs and humanitarian inclusion of older Syrian refugees in Lebanon 96%
- Use of patient centred outcomes measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: a mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad Tools 95%
- Strengthening health service delivery and governance through institutionalizing ‘Urban Health Atlas’ - a geo-referenced Information Communication and Technology tool: lessons learned from an implementation research in three cities in Bangladesh 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A community developed conceptual model for reducing long-term health problems in children with intellectual disability in India 96%
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 95%
- Willingness and Perceived ability to pay for Ugandas Proposed National Health Insurance Scheme among Informal Sector workers in Iganga and Mayuge districts, Uganda: A Contingent Valuation Method. 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A double-edged sword - Telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: Findings from a global mixed methods study of healthcare providers 94%
- Legal residency status and its relationship with health indicators among Syrian refugees in Lebanon: a nested cross-sectional study 93%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation in Sierra Leone 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Synthesizing evidence regarding community-based volunteer facilitated programs supporting integrated care transitions from hospital to home: A scoping review protocol 94%
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 94%
- Experiences of Communities with Lebanon's Model of Care for Non-Communicable Diseases (NCD): A Cross-Sectional Household Survey from Greater Beirut 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.