Back

A Local Outpatient Practice-Level Prediction Model for Short-Term Psychiatric Emergency Presentation

Havlik, J. L.; Tyrrell, B.; Bell, N.; Polaschek, J.; Arzubi, E. R.

2026-07-01 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.29.26356785 medRxiv
Show abstract

Importance: Psychiatric emergency department (ED) presentations are difficult to predict using general medical risk stratification tools. Health information exchange (HIE) data may improve prediction by capturing fragmented care across settings. Objective: To develop and temporally validate a machine learning model using HIE and geospatial data to predict 30-day psychiatric ED presentation among outpatients receiving psychiatric care and to compare its performance with standard clinical risk scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients seen at Frontier Psychiatry with records in the Big Sky Care Connect statewide HIE. Structured clinical data were linked to zip code-level sociodemographic measures. The analytic unit was the patient snapshot, defined as all structured data available up to a given point. Models were evaluated in temporally separated train and test sets. Exposures: Predictors derived from HIE structured data, including prior utilization, diagnoses, medications, laboratory data, and zip code-linked geospatial deprivation and vulnerability measures. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was psychiatric ED presentation within 30 days, identified from structured encounter-type fields and primary diagnosis codes for psychiatric or substance use disorders. Model discrimination was compared with a parsimonious clinical baseline model and LACE and Elixhauser scores. Results: In the test set, 343 of 16,469 snapshots (2.1%) were followed by a qualifying psychiatric ED presentation within 30 days, corresponding to 102 ED visits among 68 patients. The machine learning model showed discrimination in temporally held-out testing and outperformed the clinical baseline model as well as LACE and Elixhauser scores. At a prespecified decision threshold, the model reduced the number needed to evaluate from more than 40 with universal screening to 3.4 to identify 1 true-positive case, while identifying over two fifths of 30-day psychiatric ED presentations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, a locally developed machine learning model using statewide HIE data showed improved prediction of 30-day psychiatric ED presentation compared with selected general-purpose risk scores. The results support the feasibility of HIE-enabled local psychiatric risk modeling and suggest other practices could develop similarly tailored models. Prospective studies are needed to assess clinical utility and effects on outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
2
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.5%
4
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
5
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
7
American Journal of Psychiatry
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.9%
9
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.9%
50% of probability mass above
10
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
11
BMJ Mental Health
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
12
JAMA Psychiatry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
13
Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
14
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
15
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
16
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
17
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
18
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
19
BJPsych Open
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
20
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
21
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.6%
22
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
24
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
25
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
26
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
27
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
28
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
29
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%