A Local Outpatient Practice-Level Prediction Model for Short-Term Psychiatric Emergency Presentation
Havlik, J. L.; Tyrrell, B.; Bell, N.; Polaschek, J.; Arzubi, E. R.
Show abstract
Importance: Psychiatric emergency department (ED) presentations are difficult to predict using general medical risk stratification tools. Health information exchange (HIE) data may improve prediction by capturing fragmented care across settings. Objective: To develop and temporally validate a machine learning model using HIE and geospatial data to predict 30-day psychiatric ED presentation among outpatients receiving psychiatric care and to compare its performance with standard clinical risk scores. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients seen at Frontier Psychiatry with records in the Big Sky Care Connect statewide HIE. Structured clinical data were linked to zip code-level sociodemographic measures. The analytic unit was the patient snapshot, defined as all structured data available up to a given point. Models were evaluated in temporally separated train and test sets. Exposures: Predictors derived from HIE structured data, including prior utilization, diagnoses, medications, laboratory data, and zip code-linked geospatial deprivation and vulnerability measures. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was psychiatric ED presentation within 30 days, identified from structured encounter-type fields and primary diagnosis codes for psychiatric or substance use disorders. Model discrimination was compared with a parsimonious clinical baseline model and LACE and Elixhauser scores. Results: In the test set, 343 of 16,469 snapshots (2.1%) were followed by a qualifying psychiatric ED presentation within 30 days, corresponding to 102 ED visits among 68 patients. The machine learning model showed discrimination in temporally held-out testing and outperformed the clinical baseline model as well as LACE and Elixhauser scores. At a prespecified decision threshold, the model reduced the number needed to evaluate from more than 40 with universal screening to 3.4 to identify 1 true-positive case, while identifying over two fifths of 30-day psychiatric ED presentations. Conclusions and Relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, a locally developed machine learning model using statewide HIE data showed improved prediction of 30-day psychiatric ED presentation compared with selected general-purpose risk scores. The results support the feasibility of HIE-enabled local psychiatric risk modeling and suggest other practices could develop similarly tailored models. Prospective studies are needed to assess clinical utility and effects on outcomes.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Stratifying Risk for Postpartum Depression at Time of Hospital Discharge 92%
- Trends in Prevalence of Cannabis Use Disorders among U.S. Veterans with and without Psychiatric Disorders Between 2005 and 2019 92%
- Penetrance and pleiotropy of polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia in 90,000 patients across three healthcare systems 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The path toward generalizable clinical prediction models 94%
- Stability of diagnostic coding of psychiatric outpatient visits across the transition from the second to the third version of the Danish National Patient Registry 92%
- Receiving information on machine learning-based clinical decision support systems in psychiatric services increases staff trust in these systems: A randomized survey experiment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical benefits of modifying the evening light environment in an acute psychiatric unit: A single-centre, two-arm, parallel-group, pragmatic effectiveness randomised controlled trial 93%
- Mapping patient interactions in psychiatric presentations to a tertiary emergency department 93%
- Rare but elevated incidence of hematological malignancy after clozapine use in schizophrenia: a population cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence, Comorbidity, and Sociodemographic Correlates of Psychiatric Disorders in the All Of Us Biobank 92%
- Evaluation of large language model chatbot responses to psychotic prompts 90%
- Longitudinal Changes in Functional Connectivity in Antipsychotic-treated and Antipsychotic-naive Patients with First Episode Psychosis 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.