Back

Directed evolution of compact synthetic promoters via AlphaGenome and genetic algorithms

Nie, L.

2026-07-09 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.06.28.735069 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Compact tissue-specific promoters are highly desirable for gene therapy because viral vectors possess limited packaging capacity. However, existing promoter engineering strategies rely primarily on rational design or de novo sequence generation and lack efficient approaches for compressing long native promoters while preserving regulatory specificity. Although genome foundation models have substantially improved sequence-to-function prediction, they have not been effectively translated into computational platforms for promoter engineering. Here, we present VirEvo, a computational promoter engineering framework that integrates a virtual dual-luciferase assay (VirDLA), genome-foundation-model-guided genetic evolution, and an orthogonal Pan-Tissue Consistency Filter (PTCF). VirDLA introduces an internal-reference normalization strategy inspired by dual-luciferase reporter assays, enabling relative comparison of promoter activity across tissues without retraining AlphaGenome. Guided by these normalized activity scores, VirEvo iteratively optimizes promoter selectivity, off-target activity, and sequence length. Using the human p16INK4a promoter as a proof of concept, VirEvo evolved a compact synthetic promoter, SRP2M, of only 398 bp, representing an 85.9% reduction in sequence length. Experimental validation using dual-luciferase reporter assays in senescent IMR90 fibroblasts demonstrated that SRP2M retained 77% of wild-type senescence selectivity while reducing basal leakage to 52% of the wild-type level. Together, these results demonstrate the feasibility of genome-foundation-model-guided promoter engineering. VirEvo provides a generalizable framework for designing compact tissue-specific regulatory elements and extends the application of genome foundation models from functional prediction to synthetic regulatory engineering.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
34.0%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.3%
50% of probability mass above
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.2%
4
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.4%
5
Trends in Biotechnology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
7
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.4%
8
Journal of Biological Engineering
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
9
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.7%
10
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
12
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
13
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
1.0%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
17
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.8%
18
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
20
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
21
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%