Back

Diagnostic accuracy and usability of the Pluslife MTB assay on tongue and sputum swabs in symptomatic and asymptomatic adults in South Africa

David, A.; Scott, L. E.; Singh, L.; Marokane, P.; da Silva, M. P.; Gast, D.; Noble, L.; Waja, Z.; Moloantoa, T.; Martinson, N.; Stevens, W.

2026-07-09 infectious diseases
10.64898/2026.06.28.26350594 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Access to accurate tuberculosis (TB) diagnostics remains limited, particularly in high-burden settings. The Pluslife MTB assay is among the first molecular tests specifically designed for swab-based detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and offers near point-of-care use. Methods: We conducted a prospective diagnostic accuracy study in South Africa to evaluate the performance of the Pluslife assay on tongue swabs (TSs) and sputum swabs (SSs) among symptomatic and asymptomatic adults. Results were compared against liquid culture as the reference standard and Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra (Xpert Ultra) as a comparator. Operational characteristics and ease-of-use were assessed through structured observation and Likert-scale scoring by testing personnel. Results: Of 256 participants enrolled, 92 [36%] were people with HIV (PHIV) and 217 were included in the final analysis. Culture confirmed TB in 41/217 (19%). The Pluslife assay demonstrated sensitivity of 85% (95% CI: 70.8-94.4) on SSs, comparable to Xpert Ultra on sputum (83%, 95% CI: 67.9-92.8), and detected one additional case missed by Xpert Ultra. Sensitivity on TSs was lower (63%, 95% CI: 46.9-77.9), particularly among PHIV. Specificity exceeded 97% across specimen types. Concordance on TSs between Pluslife and Xpert Ultra increased with higher bacterial loads. Operational evaluation showed short hands-on time and high ease-of-use scores, though limitations were noted for patient identifier recording and troubleshooting on the Pluslife MiniDock device. Conclusions: The Pluslife MTB assay on SSs shows comparable performance to existing rapid diagnostics and favorable usability. Tongue swabs remain feasible but less reliable, supporting sputum as the preferred first specimen for TB diagnosis.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 2%
11.7%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.7%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 25%
6.6%
4
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.2%
5
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
7
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
9
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
10
Journal of Medical Microbiology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
12
Emerging Infectious Diseases
105 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
13
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
14
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
16
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
17
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
73 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
20
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
22
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
23
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.6%
30
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%