Back

From mountaintops to metacollections: using genomics to evaluate ex situ conservation collections. A case study from tropical montane cloud forest plants

Cascini, M.; Simpson, L.; Worboys, S.; Worboys, W.; Guja, L.; Knapp, Z.; Bredell, P.; Percival, J.; Rossetto, M.; Crayn, D.

2026-07-03 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.27.734930 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A core aim of ex situ conservation is to represent wild genetic diversity in managed living collections. For the climate-threatened tropical montane cloud forest (TMCF) flora of northeast Australia, an ex situ metacollection of plants and seeds has been established by the Tropical Mountain Plant Science (TroMPS) project. In this study we used reduced-representation sequencing (DArTseq) of wild, herbarium, and ex situ material alongside provenance information for ten species, to pursue two central aims: to characterise landscape-scale genetic structure across species' ranges, and to evaluate how well the assembled metacollections represent that wild diversity. Analyses revealed consistent patterns of genetic differentiation among mountain top populations across multiple species, reflecting the isolating influence of lowland gaps between upland habitats, with the degree of differentiation varying among species. These results provide the first genetic baseline for Australian TMCF flora and reinforce the importance of treating individual mountain top populations as distinct units for conservation management. Additionally, the project provided valuable insights into the logistical challenges of coordinated multi-institutional collecting, informing strategies for metacollection design more broadly. Evaluation of the metacollection revealed both strengths and gaps in representation across species, providing an evidence base to refine the current holdings and guide future targeted collecting to strengthen their long-term conservation value.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
31.4%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
3
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.2%
6
Biodiversity and Conservation
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
8
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
10
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
12
Applications in Plant Sciences
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
14
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
15
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
17
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.0%
18
Journal of Heredity
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
19
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
20
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
22
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
23
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%