Back

Dynamic Graph Representation Learning for Data-Driven Huntington's Disease Staging: Evaluation Against Existing Embedding Methods and State-Space Models

Abu Zohair, L. M.; Zantout, H.; Gow, A. J.; Woodward, J.; Lones, M.; Vallejo, M.

2026-06-30 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.27.26355575 medRxiv
Show abstract

Huntington's disease (HD) presents a heterogeneous neurodegenerative course, with motor, cognitive, and functional symptoms progressing differently across individuals. This atypical progression complicates the definition of discrete disease stages, hindering understanding of disease trajectories, timely pa- tient care, and therapy development. Consequently, current clinical staging systems rely heavily on clinician-defined, domain-specific criteria and fixed clinical measurement boundaries for stage assignment, reducing objectivity and often leading to overlapping clinical measurements across stages. While machine learning methods can help, existing approaches cannot fully capture complex temporal relationships within and across patients. We propose URL- STFN, a dynamic graph-based representation learning model that encodes both inter- and intra-patient temporal patterns from longitudinal clinical measures. We then evaluate disease stages formed through clustering and stability analysis of URL-STFN latent representations, and compare them with representations obtained from conventional embedding approaches. We further benchmark these clustering-based stages against states derived from conventional temporal models, including DHMM. We hypothesize that clustering URL-STFN latent representations enables identification of HD stages with reduced overlap in clinical measurements. The proposed framework is evaluated using 1,477 clinical visits from the Enroll-HD dataset, a large lon- gitudinal cohort with repeated clinical assessments. For staging, we used 44 clinical measurements spanning motor, cognitive, and functional domains. URL-STFN identifies clinically meaningful HD stages consistent with estab- lished disease progression while reducing overlap in clinical feature values compared with DHMM-derived and clinical staging approaches. These find- ings highlight the potential of a dynamic graph-based representation learning and clustering framework to support more objective, data-driven, and precise HD staging.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.8%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.8%
6
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
7
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
9
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
13
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
14
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
16
Experimental Neurology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
18
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
20
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
25
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
29
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
30
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%