Back

Rare-Class Collapse in ECG-Based Ventricular Tachycardia and Fibrillation Detection: A Systematic Benchmark of Class-Imbalance Mitigation from Reweighting to Cascade Classification

Tiruwa, K. R.

2026-06-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.26.26356694 medRxiv
Show abstract

Ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are the leading electrical causes of sudden cardiac death, but automated detection is limited by strong class imbalance, where lethal arrhythmias account for fewer than 22% of ECG segments. In this setting, standard classifiers can achieve high accuracy by predicting normal rhythm in most cases while missing many lethal events, a failure mode referred to as rare-class collapse. We evaluated six imbalance-handling approaches: naive logistic regression, inverse-frequency reweighting, label-distribution-aware margin loss (LDAM), cost-sensitive training, two-stage cascade classification, and anomaly detection on 15,614 ECG segments from three PhysioNet databases (VTaC, VFDB, CUDB), with an overall normal-to-lethal ratio of 3.6:1. All methods were assessed at a fixed operating point of 95% specificity using recall, area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and missed-lethal-event rate (MLER). The naive model achieved 45.1% recall (MLER = 0.549), missing 564 of 1,027 lethal events despite 84.1% accuracy. The two-stage cascade performed best, with 65.2% recall, AUPRC of 0.821, and MLER of 0.348, reducing missed events by 37% and achieving the highest decision-curve net benefit. Per-source analysis showed near-complete VF detection (recall up to 0.975) but much lower VT detection (recall 0.183), suggesting a feature-space limitation due to spectral similarity between organized VT and rapid sinus rhythm. Overall, the results show that evaluation metrics strongly influence the visibility of rare-class failure, and that cascade-based methods outperform simpler reweighting approaches for detecting lethal arrhythmias.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.6%
6
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
5.6%
7
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
10
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
12
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
15
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
16
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
17
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
19
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
20
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
22
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
23
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
26
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
20 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
29
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%