Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging With Emphasis on Generative and Foundation-Based Methods: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global and United Kingdom Research, 2017-2025
Naidu, J. S.; Baskaradoss, V.
Show abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI), including generative and foundation-based methods, has rapidly expanded within medical imaging research. However, the structure, citation impact, collaboration patterns, and thematic orientation of national research ecosystems remain incompletely characterised. Objectives: To evaluate global research trends in AI applied to medical imaging between 2017 and 2025, with detailed analysis of United Kingdom (UK)-affiliated output, citation performance, collaboration structure, funding landscape, and thematic evolution, with emphasis on generative and foundation-based methodologies. Materials and Methods: A bibliometric analysis of Scopus-indexed publications (2017-2025) was performed using a predefined search strategy targeting AI and medical imaging concepts, with emphasis on generative and foundation-based terms. Records were analysed globally and filtered for UK affiliation. Descriptive indicators including total publications (TP), total citations (TC), citations per paper (CPP), and year-on-year growth were calculated. Co-authorship and keyword co-occurrence networks were generated using VOSviewer (v1.6.19). Results: A total of 13,452 publications were identified globally (194,650 citations; global CPP 14.47), of which 889 (6.61%) were UK-affiliated. The UK ranked fourth by publication volume yet demonstrated higher citation efficiency (CPP 21.00) than several higher-volume countries. UK output increased approximately 18-fold between 2017 and 2025, with evidence of a citation-lag effect in recent years. Research activity was concentrated within a small number of institutions accounting for nearly half of national output, although citation impact varied independently of volume. Journal-dominant dissemination was associated with higher average citation impact compared with conference-centric models. Keyword analysis identified three principal thematic clusters: generative/deep learning methodologies, MRI- and diffusion-focused applications, and broader diagnostic imaging workflows. Highly cited publications were initially dominated by generative adversarial network-based reconstruction and synthesis, with recent rapid citation growth observed in diffusion and foundation-model architectures. Conclusion: UK-affiliated research represents a rapidly expanding and highly cited component of the global AI medical imaging literature, with increasing emphasis on generative, diffusion-based, and foundation-model approaches. These findings provide a reproducible bibliometric baseline for monitoring research activity, collaboration patterns, and potential translational priorities, while recognising that citation-based indicators do not directly measure clinical implementation, methodological quality, or real-world impact.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fibre tracing in biomedical images: An objective comparison between seven algorithms 93%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 92%
- PRCnet: An Efficient Model for Automatic Detection of Brain Tumor in MRI Images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a Fully Automated Imaging Biomarker for HCC Risk Assessment via MRI-Based Tumor Segmentation and EPM 93%
- Content-based image retrieval assists radiologists in diagnosing eye and orbital mass lesions in MRI 92%
- Radius-Optimized Efficient Template Matching for Lesion Detection from Brain Images 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating Large Language Model-Generated Brain MRI Protocols: Performance of GPT4o, o3-mini, DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen2.5-72B 93%
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 93%
- Impact of Non-Contrast Enhanced Imaging Input Sequences on the Generation of Virtual Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI Scans using Neural Networks 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.