Back

Cognitive and affective neurodevelopment in youth exposed to deprivation and threat

Kardan, O.; Angstadt, M.; Molloy, M. F.; Trucco, E. M.; Heitzeg, M. M.; McCurry, K. L.

2026-06-28 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.25.734615 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly life adversity (ELA) is associated with notable negative consequences across development. Experiences of deprivation may affect neurocognitive development, while experiences of threat may alter emotion processing. Deprivation and threat may also differentially influence reward processing. However, unique consequences of deprivation and threat beyond low family resources are debated. MethodsWe employed an exposure vs. control data analytic approach to isolate deprivation and threat influences from socioeconomic resources. Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD(R)) Study youth exposed to neither deprivation nor threat (N=2408-2962) were matched to youth exposed to deprivation-only (N=638-721), threat-only (N=198-232), or threat non-exclusively (threat+: N=382-464) based on family income, parental education, race/ethnicity, sex, and age. Multivariate analyses were used to distinguish each ELA group from their respective control groups in the neurocognitive domain (resting-state connectomic maturation, cognitive task performance, and cortical grey matter thickness at two timepoints) and in the neuroaffective domain (nucleus accumbens and caudate activation to reward anticipation and amygdala and insula activation to fearful faces). ResultsIn the neurocognitive domain, similar latent variables (LVs) differentiated the deprivation and threat+ groups from their respective matched control groups. This LV corresponded to neurocognitive maturation, loading positively on cortical functional maturation and task performance, and negatively on cortical grey matter thickness. This LV was weaker in the deprivation and threat+ groups compared to controls. In the neuroaffective domain, no significant LVs were found. ConclusionBoth threat and deprivation exposure during childhood may delay neurocognitive development in early adolescence beyond their co-occurrence with low socioeconomic resources.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
50.6%
50% of probability mass above
2
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.8%
3
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.2%
5
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
6
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
7
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
8
JCPP Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
9
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
10
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
11
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
12
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
13
Neurobiology of Stress
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.1%
15
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
16
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
17
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Developmental Psychobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
19
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
20
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
21
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Brain, Behavior, & Immunity - Health
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%