Back

Transcriptomic analysis of FER-RALF-LRX pathway mutants suggests constitutive gene expression defects contribute to powdery mildew resistance

Leicher, H.; Fenn, A.; Messerer, M.; Wurmser, C.; Hückelhoven, R.; Kamal, N.; Stegmann, M.

2026-07-09 plant biology
10.64898/2026.06.25.734470 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The receptor kinase FERONIA (FER) perceives endogenous RAPID ALKALINIZATION FACTOR (RALF) peptides and regulates a plethora of plant physiological processes, including immunity. RALF peptides also bind to LEUCINE-RICH REPEAT EXTENSIN (LRX) proteins as structural components of the cell wall. We recently showed that the FER-RALF-LRX pathway supports colonization by the obligate biotrophic fungal pathogen Erysiphe cruciferarum (Ecr), a member of the powdery mildew species complex that infects Arabidopsis. Genetic disruption of the pathway primarily affects conidiation of the fungus, raising the question of effects on fungal nutrition. To get further insight into the underlying mechanisms, we performed RNA sequencing (RNAseq) to identify differential transcriptional responses of FER-RALF-LRX pathway mutants upon Ecr infection. Surprisingly, our results revealed that pathway disruption has a limited impact on the overall transcriptional changes upon fungal infection. However, consistent with previous reports, FER-RALF-LRX pathway mutants show changes in basal expression of a plethora of genes, mainly associated with cell wall metabolism, jasmonic acid signalling, amino acid biosynthesis and secondary metabolism. Many of these genes are regulated by Ecr infection across genotypes, too. This raises the question whether these are relevant pathway components for powdery mildew host establishment downstream of the FER-RALF-LRX module. In summary, our data reveals new insights into FER-RALF-LRX-dependent responses that may support host susceptibility to biotrophic plant pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Plant Pathology
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.7%
3
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.6%
5
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
6
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
7
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
4.2%
9
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
10
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
11
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
13
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Plant Science
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 32%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
22
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
23
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 55%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.8%
25
Plant Physiology and Biochemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
26
Plant Molecular Biology
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
Plant Pathology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
30
Planta
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%