Back

Modeling and validation of parallel co-flows layer widths in open-capillary trigger valve systems

Caira, T.; Tokihiro, J.; Shaposhnikov, A.; Whitten, J. M.; Su, X.; Shin, A.; Robertson, I. H.; Nicholson, T. M.; Olanrewaju, A. O.; Berthier, E.; Theberge, A. B.; Berthier, J.

2026-06-26 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.25.734354 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Control of fluids is a hallmark of microfluidic systems and fundamental for the successful application of microfluidic devices. Trigger valves use geometric features to autonomously control the release of fluids in microfluidic devices. Our previous work has adapted geometries used in closed trigger valve systems to enable use in open systems, allowing for open microfluidic devices with up to three trigger valves. Here, we focus on the parallel co-flows produced by sequential release of trigger valves and present a model that predicts their layer widths as a function of the geometric characteristics of the different side channels of each trigger valve. We show layered co-flows with widths as low as 50 microns. Additionally, we expand the use of trigger valves in open microfluidic devices by incorporating 1) varied step heights, 2) devices with up to seven trigger valves, and 3) use of varied fluids and plastics. To validate the implementation and use of these trigger valves in open systems, we have developed a theoretical framework to compare predicted outcomes (i.e., fluid travel distance, velocity, and layering width) with our experimental values. This theoretical work offers applications in various fields, including hydrogel patterning for 3D cell culture, organ-on-a-chip models, at-home sample preparation, and autonomous microfluidic systems for biosensing.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Lab on a Chip
96 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
3
Physics of Fluids
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
5
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.3%
6
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
8
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
9
Langmuir
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
10
Small
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
12
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
APL Bioengineering
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Advanced Materials Technologies
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
IFAC-PapersOnLine
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
18
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.4%
20
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
21
Biofabrication
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
22
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
24
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
26
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
27
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
28
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.1%
29
SLAS Technology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
30
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%