Back

A High-Quality Acetylation Dataset Reveals Modest Data Requirements for Transfer Learning to Identify Little Studied Post-Translational Modifications

Hartmaring, Y.; Wang, S.; Jones, A. R.; Vizcaino, J. A.; Schlaffner, C. N.; Renard, B. Y.

2026-06-30 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.25.733353 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Dysregulation of post-translational modifications (PTMs) is associated with severe pathologies, including cancers and Alzheimers disease. Despite their biological importance, identifying modified peptides remains challenging due to the immense combinatorial search space. While searches benefit from prior knowledge of a peptides modification status, the data scarcity for most PTMs hinders the development of accurate deep learning classifiers like AHLF (ad hoc learning of peptide fragmentation). Here, we overcome this data bottle-neck for acetylation and ubiquitination. We harmonised a dataset with about 500,000 high quality acetylated peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs) from nine publicly available acetylation-enriched datasets. We fine-tuned AHLF with the acetylation and a 2-million spectra strong ubiquitination dataset separately and assessed the minimum data requirement for training by iteratively downsampling. Training separate models on SILAC and label-free subsets also assessed the impact of data diversity. The resulting acetylation and ubiquitination models achieve an AUC of 0.87 and 0.90 respectively. Beyond 28,500 acetylated spectra, corresponding to roughly 0.3% of the original models training data, additional data just provides minor performance gains. Finally, we show that data diversity is beneficial for generalizability, while models trained on homogeneous data sources tend to overfit to their respective data type. All code, and model weights are available at https://gitlab.com/dacs-hpi/ahlf-ptmai.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.