Fibrosis-4 Index and Long-Term Cardiovascular Outcomes in Primary Aldosteronism
Tsai, C.-H.; Chang, Y.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Wu, W.-C.; Chang, Y.-Y.; Chen, U.-L.; Lee, B.-C.; Hung, C.-S.; Huang, K.-H.; Chueh, J. S.; Wu, V.-C.; Lin, Y.-H.
Show abstract
Background: The fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) is a simple noninvasive marker originally developed to assess liver fibrosis risk. Accumulating evidence suggests that FIB-4 is associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, but its prognostic relevance in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) remains unclear. Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, patients with PA were stratified into low, intermediate, and high FIB-4 groups using established cutoffs: <1.3, 1.3-2.67, and >2.67. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) across FIB-4 categories. Results: Among 2,467 patients with PA, 1,215 (49.3%) had FIB-4 <1.3, 863 (35.0%) had FIB-4 1.3-2.67, and 389 (15.8%) had FIB-4 >2.67. Patients with higher FIB-4 were older and had lower body mass index, worse renal function, lower potassium, and a higher comorbidity burden. During follow-up, all-cause mortality increased across FIB-4 categories, from 13.9% in the low FIB-4 group to 58.1% in the high FIB-4 group. After multivariable adjustment, FIB-4 >2.67 was associated with higher risks of all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.54-2.54) and MACE (adjusted HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.44?2.20), compared with FIB-4 <1.3. Adjusted linear regression analyses showed that higher FIB-4 was significantly associated with lower renin and higher aldosterone-to-renin ratio. Conclusions: In patients with PA, elevated FIB-4 identified a high-risk subgroup with increased all-cause mortality and MACE. FIB-4 may serve as a simple, noninvasive tool for prognostic stratification in patients with PA.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint associations of pregnancy complications and postpartum maternal renal biomarkers with severe cardiovascular morbidities: A US racially diverse prospective birth cohort study 94%
- Association of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers with the Risk of Hospitalization and Death in Hypertensive Patients with Coronavirus Disease-19 94%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertension Management Dynamics in Pediatric CKD: Insights from the 4C Study 94%
- Trends in Awareness, Antihypertensive Medication Use and Blood Pressure Control by Race and Ethnicity Among Adults with Hypertension in the United States: A National Health and Nutrition Examination Analysis from 2011 to 2018 94%
- Effects of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibition on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 Expression: Insights into COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiple Biomarkers to Predict Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusions 94%
- Association of left atrial structure and function with cognitive function among adults with metabolic syndrome 93%
- Risk of Cardiovascular Events after Covid-19: a double-cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Hypertension and renin-angiotensin system blockers are not associated with expression of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) in the kidney 93%
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 92%
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction and estimating benefits from novel interventions 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.