Racial and Ethnic Differences in Exposure to Antibiotics Associated with Clostridioides difficile Infection in US Academic Dental Care
Gladden, A. D.; Westgard, L. K.; Tam, R. A.; Ugbala, M. C.; Foong, K. S.; Wurcel, A. G.
Show abstract
Background Severe Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) morbidity and mortality disproportionately affect Black and Hispanic patients in the United States. Antibiotic exposure is the primary modifiable risk factor for CDI, and clindamycin is among the agents most strongly associated with related harm. Characterizing inequities in prescribing is critical. Dentistry is a major source of clindamycin prescriptions. Academic dental clinics serve diverse patient populations and provide an ideal setting to evaluate prescribing across racial and ethnic groups. We therefore examined antibiotic use and cumulative clindamycin exposure as measures of CDI-associated risk. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of electronic health records from 5 US academic dental institutions from 2021 through 2023. We analyzed 552,428 encounters among 132,770 patients with documented race/ethnicity to estimate adjusted odds of receiving any oral antibiotic and clindamycin by race/ethnicity. Secondary outcomes evaluated total antibiotic exposure among dental provider-prescribed antibiotics, focusing on higher-than-standard cumulative dosing of clindamycin (>8400 mg) and amoxicillin (>10,500 mg). Results Oral antibiotic prescribing occurred in 1.9% of encounters. Compared with White patients, Black, Hispanic, and Other race patients had slightly lower adjusted odds of receiving any oral antibiotic, while Black patients had greater odds of receiving a higher-than-standard cumulative clindamycin dose when clindamycin was prescribed (adjusted odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-3.82). Conclusion Racial and ethnic inequities in dental antibiotic prescribing extended beyond antibiotic receipt to cumulative clindamycin exposure. Although CDI outcomes were not directly measured, these prescribing differences may have implications for disparities in CDI-associated harm and warrant further investigation.
Matching journals
The top 14 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk Factor Analysis for Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase Producing Enterobacterales Colonization or Infection: Evaluation of a Novel Approach to Assess Local Prevalence as a Risk Factor 90%
- N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators Remain Effective After Extensive Reuse During the COVID-19 Pandemic 87%
- A Comparison of Aerosol Mitigation Strategies and Aerosol Persistence in Dental Environments 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ward-Level Factors Associated with Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Acquisition – an Electronic Medical Records study in Singapore 90%
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 89%
- Clinical pattern of antibiotic overuse and misuse in primary healthcare hospitals in the southwest of China 89%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pain management after dental extractions – non-opioid combination analgesics minimize opioid use for acute dental pain 92%
- Estimating the Per-Application Effectiveness of Chlorhexidine Gluconate and Mupirocin in Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Decolonization in Intensive Care Units 90%
- The Impact of the “Muslim Ban” Executive Order on Healthcare Utilization in Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Allergic to Confounding: Leveraging Penicillin Allergy as an Instrumental Variable to Estimate the Causal Effect of Antibiotic Use on Resistance 93%
- Hospital unit colonization pressure and nosocomial acquisition of drug susceptible and drug resistant pathogens 90%
- The potential health and economic impact of dexamethasone treatment for patients with COVID-19 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.