Beyond the Sentence: Clinical and Social Determinants of Forensic Hospitalization Duration in Northern Israel
Kovalenko, I.; Simonov, S.; Shamir, A.; Sharony, L.
Show abstract
Purpose: Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization under court orders requires careful balancing of legal obligations and clinical needs. Identifying factors that influence the length of these hospital stays helps clarify the relationship between legal frameworks and psychiatric treatment. This study aims to describe the socio-demographic, clinical, and legal profiles of individuals hospitalized under court warrants and to identify factors independently associated with the duration of forensic hospitalization. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 119 patients discharged between 2018 and 2023. Data were collected from medical and legal records, including socio-demographic details, psychiatric diagnoses, offense types, hospital stay lengths, and legal proceedings. Results: Most patients were men (91.6%) diagnosed with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (97.5%), with high rates of comorbid substance use disorder (79.0%) and unemployment (85.7%). The median hospital stay was 19.0 months, representing 40% of the maximum statutory sentence. Patients with low-severity offenses served a larger share of their maximum sentence (47%) than those with high-severity offenses (24%). Time to first discretionary leave was the strongest predictor of total stay duration in univariable analysis. Conclusion: The finding that patients with minor offenses have longer hospital stays than those with serious offenses confirms that clinical factors, rather than offense severity, primarily influence discharge decisions. These findings support moving toward personalized, clinically focused, and family-inclusive forensic discharge planning while maintaining public safety.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Short-term functional outcome in psychotic patients. Results of the Turku Early Psychosis Study (TEPS) 93%
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 93%
- Profiles of inpatient psychiatry referrals: A 4-year analysis in a Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 95%
- Ethnic differences in receipt of psychological interventions in Early Intervention in Psychosis services in England: a cross-sectional study 92%
- Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- One year prevalence of psychotic disorders among first treatment contact patients at the National Psychiatric referral and teaching hospital in Uganda 94%
- Influences of race and clinical variables on psychiatric genetic research participation: Results from a schizophrenia sample 94%
- Emergency department visits and boarding for pediatric patients with suicidality before and during the COVID-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Severe outcomes and length of stay among people with schizophrenia hospitalized for COVID-19: A population-based retrospective cohort study 94%
- Validation of an ICD-code-based case definition for psychotic illness across three health systems 94%
- Can we detect the undetected? Comparing the prodromes of individuals with first episode psychosis detected and undetected by clinical high risk for psychosis services: an electronic health record study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Analysis of diagnosis instability in electronic health records reveals diverse disease trajectories of severe mental illness 94%
- Predictors of suicidal thoughts and behavior in children: results from penalized logistic regression analyses in the ABCD study 93%
- Associations between antipsychotic use, substance use and relapse risks in patients with schizophrenia - real-world evidence from two national cohorts 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.