Back

Structure-Informed Cognitive Representation Improves Prediction of Real-World Functioning in Schizophrenia: A Comparison with Conventional Domain Scores

Chen, C.

2026-06-29 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.25.26356524 medRxiv
Show abstract

Predicting real-world functional outcomes in schizophrenia (SCZ) remains a clinical priority, but existing models are limited by methodological constraints and a lack of established clinical utility. Cognition is a commonly used predictor, and the Normative Latent Cognitive Structure (N-LCS) approach provides a structure-informed representation that may address limitations of conventional domain-level scores. Data from two merged COBRE cohorts (163 SCZ, 180 healthy controls) were used to develop ridge regression models for economic (EF), occupational (OF), and social (SF) functioning, using N-LCS deviation metrics alongside a priori selected demographic and clinical predictors. Score-based models using MCCB domain T-scores were developed for comparison. Performance was evaluated using bootstrap-corrected AUC, balanced accuracy, and calibration for binary outcomes, and weighted kappa and log-loss for SF. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess clinical utility for the binary outcomes. The EF model achieved a corrected AUC of 0.76 and balanced accuracy of 0.73. The OF model achieved 0.72 and 0.71, respectively. The SF model showed modest performance (weighted kappa = 0.33). DCA indicated net benefit across the full threshold range for EF and above 0.37 for OF. N-LCS models demonstrated comparable or modestly superior performance to score-based models while using fewer predictors and showing better calibration for EF. These findings support the predictive utility of N-LCS for functional outcomes in SCZ and underscore the need for external validation in independent cohorts as a next step toward clinical application.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Schizophrenia Bulletin
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
2
Schizophrenia
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
3
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.5%
4
Schizophrenia Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
5
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
7
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.0%
8
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
9
BMC Psychiatry
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.1%
11
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
12
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
13
Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
48 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.5%
14
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
15
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
16
Computational Psychiatry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
17
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
20
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
21
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%