Back

The effects of fox movement and landscape heterogeneity on the spread of sarcoptic mange in urban settings

Dimitrov, N.; Gelmi-Candusso, T. A.; Krkosek, M.; Fortin, M.-J.

2026-06-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.24.734291 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ContextThe movement of vertebrate hosts across urbanized landscapes can play a key role in the transmission of direct-contact diseases. Understanding how wildlife hosts move in urban landscapes, and how transmission is affected by their landscape-constrained and disease-altered movements, is imperative for better predicting the spread of disease. ObjectiveWe assess how the movement of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) according to landcover type, and their infection status, affect the spread of mange (caused by Sarcoptes scabiei) in an urbanized landscape. MethodsWe developed a mange transmission model (MTM) using an agent-based model to compare two movement behaviours of foxes in Scarborough (Ontario, Canada): random and landcover-based. We further assessed the effects of movement on disease transmission by considering the foxs infection status and comparing a range of movement probability scenarios. We quantified the number of effective contact events and the effective reproduction number (Re) according to each scenario. ResultsWe found that both landcover-dependent movement and infection status influenced the spread of mange within fox populations. The number of effective contact events and effective reproduction number Re was greatest when landscape heterogeneity was included in the model and foxes moved through paths of least resistance to movement, and when susceptible and infected foxes had an equal probability of leaving a fragmented habitat patch. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that mange spread may be accelerated along movement corridors in fragmented, heterogenous landscapes. As urban areas expand and remnant habitat within these is further lost and animals are relegated to fewer movement pathways, disease transmission may increase.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
23.3%
2
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
15.7%
3
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 24%
4.2%
6
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
7
Landscape Ecology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
8
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.5%
9
One Health
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
International Journal for Parasitology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
12
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
13
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
16
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.0%
20
Journal of Medical Entomology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
24
Conservation Science and Practice
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
27
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%
29
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%