Back

Drought alters volatile profiles in European beech saplings across genetically diverse backgrounds

Tang, T.; Guerra, T.; Coq--Etchegaray, D.; Schmid, B.; Reichert, L.; Wiesenberg, G. L. B.; Schuman, M. C.; Moorsel, S. v.

2026-06-25 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.24.733805 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIEuropean beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) is a widely distributed, ecologically and economically important deciduous tree species in European forests, but is increasingly threatened by drought stress. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are ubiquitous plant metabolites that may serve as non-invasive biomarkers of drought stress, yet they have rarely been studied in European beech. C_LIO_LIIn this study, we examined VOC responses of European beech to experimental drought across diverse genetic backgrounds in a common garden. The 72 four-year-old beech saplings represented three genetic clusters, seven provenances (geographic seed sources), and 12 maternal seed families. Half of the saplings were assigned to the drought treatment and received no water for 14 days, while the remaining saplings served as controls and were watered as required. VOC profiles, quantified as peak heights of mass spectral features, were measured for all individuals during pre-drought, drought, and rewatering periods. C_LIO_LIWe found that pre-drought VOC profiles, in particular monoterpenes, varied significantly among genetic backgrounds. Experimental drought significantly altered VOC profiles, characterized by increased green leaf volatiles and decreased monoterpenes, oxidized terpenoid derivatives, and other fatty acid derivatives. Reductions in monoterpenes persisted after rewatering, indicating a drought legacy effect. Drought responses were largely conserved across genetic backgrounds, with significant seed family-specific responses detected for only three VOC features. C_LIO_LIOur findings suggest that VOC profiles are genetically structured yet highly plastic under drought and highlight their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for monitoring drought stress in European beech under climate change. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.8%
2
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Plant Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 6%
8.8%
5
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
6
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Chemical Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Plants
43 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.2%
9
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
12
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
13
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
15
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
18
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
19
Metabolomics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Horticulture Research
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
Food Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
23
American Journal of Botany
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 57%
0.8%
25
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
26
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%