Interest-holder perspectives on integrating Doing What Matters in Times of Stress with a community-based physical activity service for people experiencing mental health challenges
Mastrogiovanni, C.; Rosenbaum, S.; McKeon, G.; Choudhry, U.; Tefa, S.; Lederman, O.; Wright, K.; Teasdale, S. B.; Vancampfort, D.; Kurt, G.
Show abstract
People experiencing mental health problems often encounter fragmented systems of care in which physical and mental health needs are addressed separately. Physical activity is an evidence-based approach for improving both physical and mental health and integrating evidence-based psychosocial support with physical activity in community settings may offer a holistic and accessible approach. This study explored interest-holder perspectives on integrating the World Health Organization Doing What Matters in Times of Stress intervention within a trauma-informed, community-based physical activity service. A qualitative study was conducted within a free, community-based, university-run physical activity service in Sydney, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with people with lived expertise of mental health challenges, Clinical Exercise Professionals, and mental health service providers. Data were analysed using thematic analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. Nineteen participants (11 people with lived expertise, four Clinical Exercise Professionals, and four service providers) took part. Participants generally viewed the future delivery of Doing What Matters in Times of Stress by exercise professionals as acceptable and potentially beneficial for supporting both mental and physical health. Existing rapport with exercise professionals, the disarming nature of physical activity, and practical stress-management strategies were identified as strengths of the model of future delivery. Participants viewed Clinical Exercise Professionals as potentially well-placed to facilitate Doing What Matters in Times of Stress alongside supervised physical activity, as long as it was supported by appropriate training, supervision, referral pathways, and clear professional boundaries. Trauma-informed, inclusive environments, tailoring the intervention, prioritizing service user choice and organisational support were also considered important factors for successful future implementation. Conclusions: Integrating Doing What Matters in Times of Stress within a trusted, community-based physical activity service was perceived as acceptable and potentially meaningful for people experiencing mental health challenges. Findings warrant further piloting and evaluation of integrated physical activity and psychosocial intervention models.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 96%
- A mixed methods analysis of youth mental health intervention feasibility and acceptability in a North American city: perspectives from Seattle, Washington 95%
- Clinician perspectives on what constitutes good practice in community services for people with Complex Emotional Needs: A qualitative thematic meta-synthesis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 96%
- Exploring High Mortality Rates Among People With Multiple And Complex Needs: A Qualitative Study Using Peer Research Methods 95%
- The psychosocial impact on frontline health and social care professionals in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementing an Advance Choice Documents resource for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission 96%
- Service user perspectives of community mental health services for people with complex emotional needs: a co-produced qualitative interview study 95%
- Clinician views on best practice community care for people with complex emotional needs and how it can be achieved: a qualitative study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Process Evaluation of APPLE-Tree (Active Prevention in People at risk of dementia through Lifestyle bEhaviour Change and Technology to build REsiliEnce), a Dementia-Prevention Study focused on Health and Lifestyle changes 96%
- ‘I had no life. I was only existing’ . Factors shaping the mental health and wellbeing of people experiencing long Covid: a qualitative study 95%
- Effectiveness, acceptability and potential harms of peer support for self-harm in non-clinical settings: A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Implementation strategies for telemental health: a systematic review 96%
- A qualitative investigation of crisis cafés in England: their role, implementation, and accessibility 95%
- ‘Beyond Places of Safety’ – a qualitative study exploring the implementation of mental health crisis care innovations across England 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.