A strengths-based, participatory qualitative exploration of digital information access and critical health literacy among culturally and linguistically diverse communities in Australia
Muscat, D. M.; Mustapha-Khodragha, N.; Wong, M.; Trisnasari, S.; Talla, G.; Rizkyanti, F.; Ng, S.; Kapoor, G.; Khalid, S.; Rigby, L.; Sourour, N.; Peri, B.; Nguyen, T. M.; Mac, O.; Lim, H. M.; McCaffery, K.; Ayre, J.
Show abstract
As the volume of online health information expands, critical health literacy is increasingly positioned as a key resource for navigating the contemporary infodemic. This qualitative study examines how multi-lingual adults from diverse migrant backgrounds in Australia access and appraise online health information. Grounded in a participatory action research approach, bilingual community co-researchers (n=11), collectively speaking eight languages other than English, were embedded across all stages of the research. Semi-structured interviews with 55 participants were conducted in participants' preferred languages. Underpinned by a critical realist epistemology and a strengths-based approach, we undertook an iterative, inductive Framework analysis. We constructed two themes (comprising 7 subthemes): (1) Navigating a jungle and (2) It's always a mix of trust and scepticism. Our findings suggest that culturally and linguistically diverse communities are required to navigate demanding information environments characterised by an overwhelming volume of online health content, much of it not tailored to diverse language needs or literacy levels and drawn from sources that are often difficult to verify. Notwithstanding these structural challenges, our strengths-based analysis identified a repertoire of practices through which participants worked to locate understandable information and distinguish credible sources from misinformation. AI tools emerged as a resource in this process, operating as an extension of participant's own cognitive and linguistic work to simplify and synthesise complex information, but positioned ambivalently within credibility practices. These findings have implications for the development of culturally responsive health literacy resources that build on the existing capacities of culturally and linguistically diverse communities.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 96%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- “The impact of the Little Orange Book on how parents/carers manage symptoms of illness in children: A mixed methods study” 96%
- Artificial Intelligence for Contextual Well-being: Protocol for an Exploratory Sequential Mixed Methods Study with Medical Students as a Social Microcosm 95%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- How can rural community-engaged health services planning affect sustainable health care system changes? - A process description and qualitative analysis of data from the Rural Coordination Centre of British Columbia’s Rural Site Visits Project 94%
- Examining Australian's beliefs, misconceptions, and sources of information for COVID-19: A national online survey 94%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 94%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 94%
- How, why and when are delayed (back-up) antibiotic prescriptions used in primary care? A realist review integrating concepts of uncertainty in healthcare 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Understanding Covid-19 misinformation and vaccine hesitancy in context: Findings from a qualitative study involving citizens in Bradford, UK 95%
- “I don’t know what to do or where to go”. Experiences of accessing healthcare support from the perspectives of people living with Long Covid and healthcare professionals: A qualitative study in Bradford, UK 93%
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.