Back

The impact of the Impella RP(R) device on a failing right heart. A modelling and simulation approach to ascertain its potential

De Lazzari, B.; Richter, A.; Nix, C.; Badagliacca, R.; Pitino, A.; Gori, M.; Scoccia, G.; Capoccia, M.; DE LAZZARI, C.

2026-06-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356428 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and Objective: Indications for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) insertion include right heart failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device or early graft failure following heart transplantation. This study aimed to investigate how the upstream and downstream circulatory network interacts with the Impella RP(R) device. Methods: A numerical model of the Impella RP(R) was implemented within CARDIOSIM(C) software platform for this study. In the numerical configuration, the RVAD aspirated blood from either the right atrium (RA-PA connection) or the right ventricle (RV-PA connection) and delivered it to the pulmonary artery. Only RA-PA connection is the currently used setting for Impella RP(R) in clinical practice. Based on right ventricular (RV) decompression and total flow, our study may help define the need for a direct RV-unloading Impella RP(R). Results: The simulations showed that activating the RVAD in RA-PA mode, regardless of its rotational speed, the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) percentage change was higher than the unsupported condition when the mean systemic venous pressure (SVP) and the pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) were both set to 20 mmHg. When RV-PA connection was applied, a similar trend was observed although the PAP percentage changes were about halved compared to the RA-PA connection. Conclusions: The Impella RP(R) has the potential to become a valid option for RV support based on current experimental and simulation data. Although already in use, further evaluation in the clinical setting will likely confirm its potential and lead to a more routinely application for RV support.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 14%
13.0%
2
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.1%
4
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
5
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
5.6%
6
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.4%
9
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
10
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
12
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
14
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
15
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
17
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Physiological Measurement
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
21
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
24
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%