The impact of the Impella RP(R) device on a failing right heart. A modelling and simulation approach to ascertain its potential
De Lazzari, B.; Richter, A.; Nix, C.; Badagliacca, R.; Pitino, A.; Gori, M.; Scoccia, G.; Capoccia, M.; DE LAZZARI, C.
Show abstract
Background and Objective: Indications for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) insertion include right heart failure after implantation of a left ventricular assist device or early graft failure following heart transplantation. This study aimed to investigate how the upstream and downstream circulatory network interacts with the Impella RP(R) device. Methods: A numerical model of the Impella RP(R) was implemented within CARDIOSIM(C) software platform for this study. In the numerical configuration, the RVAD aspirated blood from either the right atrium (RA-PA connection) or the right ventricle (RV-PA connection) and delivered it to the pulmonary artery. Only RA-PA connection is the currently used setting for Impella RP(R) in clinical practice. Based on right ventricular (RV) decompression and total flow, our study may help define the need for a direct RV-unloading Impella RP(R). Results: The simulations showed that activating the RVAD in RA-PA mode, regardless of its rotational speed, the mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) percentage change was higher than the unsupported condition when the mean systemic venous pressure (SVP) and the pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) were both set to 20 mmHg. When RV-PA connection was applied, a similar trend was observed although the PAP percentage changes were about halved compared to the RA-PA connection. Conclusions: The Impella RP(R) has the potential to become a valid option for RV support based on current experimental and simulation data. Although already in use, further evaluation in the clinical setting will likely confirm its potential and lead to a more routinely application for RV support.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamics Indicates Differences Between Patients With And Without A Stroke Outcome After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation 96%
- Comparing physiological impacts of positive pressure ventilation versus self-breathing via a versatile cardiopulmonary model incorporating a novel alveoli opening mechanism 96%
- Detecting Heart Failure using novel bio-signals and a Knowledge Enhanced Neural Network 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A coupled atrioventricular-aortic setup for in-vitro hemodynamic study of the systemic circulation: Design, Fabrication, and Physiological relevancy 97%
- Ventricular anatomical complexity and gender differences impact predictions from computational models 95%
- Estimating pulse wave velocity from the radial pressure wave using machine learning algorithms 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A compact multifunctional model of the rabbit atrioventricular node with dual pathways 94%
- Machine Learning prediction of cardiac resynchronisation therapy response from combination of clinical and model-driven data 94%
- Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia onset,sustainability, and spontaneous termination in rabbit atrioventricular node model with autonomic nervous system control 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Switching the left and the right hearts: A novel bi-ventricle mechanical support strategy with spared native single-ventricle 98%
- Quantitative Assessment of Aortic Hemodynamics for Varying Left Ventricular Assist Device Outflow Graft Angles and Flow Pulsation 96%
- Effect of Sinotubular Junction Size on TAVR Leaflet Thrombosis: A Fluid-structure Interaction Analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- In Silico Modeling of Transcatheter Heart Valve Oversizing and Ellipticity, Part I: Establishing Credibility of an Advanced Model 94%
- Computational hemodynamic indices to identify Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation degeneration 94%
- Digitizing ECG image: new fully automated method and open-source software code 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.