Back

RESCUE: An end-to-end multi-agent LLM system for proactive rare-disease patient screening in the EHR

Liu, C.; Geltzeiler, A.; Afyouni, A.; Nie, M.; Ravi, K.; French, C.; Chung, W.

2026-07-01 health informatics
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356357 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Rare diseases affect a significant portion of the global population, yet patients often endure a lengthy diagnostic odyssey, frequently missing the opportunity for timely whole-exome or whole-genome sequencing (WES/WGS). Existing informatics tools often rely on pre-identified patients or rigid, institution-specific rule sets, failing to address the broader operational question of clinical necessity and feasibility. Method: We introduce RESCUE, an end-to-end, multi-agent LLM-powered workflow designed for proactive rare-disease screening across the entire electronic health record (EHR). RESCUE utilizes a team of specialized agents including Ontology, Modeling, Screening, and Review, to automate the screening process. The Ontology Agent classifies clinical data into a four-tier genetic-evidence taxonomy; the Modeling Agent builds a positive-unlabeled (PU) XGBoost classifier to identify potential cases; the Screening Agent applies these models across the EHR population; and the Review Agent evaluates candidates by sampling clinical notes to ensure medical necessity and operational feasibility for sequencing. Results: Our retrospective evaluation on a holdout set (n=12,591) demonstrated strong discrimination (AUC 0.808). Among 175,842 eligible patients from an institutional base of ~494,577, RESCUE-flagged candidates were 7.4-fold more likely to receive subsequent genetic workups compared to controls. Blinded manual chart reviews confirmed that RESCUE identifies previously missed, medically necessary patients with 80% precision, while simultaneously accounting for prior testing history. Conclusion: By decoupling expert roles into modular agents, RESCUE offers a flexible, scalable, and adaptable framework for rare-disease screening. This approach overcomes the limitations of traditional rule-based methods and provides a reproducible, agentic pathway to reduce diagnostic delays and improve patient care at an institutional scale.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.