Attitudes of People Living with Dementia and their Carers towards the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence to inform Structured Medication Reviews
Linder, B.; Du, J.; Tavares, N.; Zhu, T.; Tiwari, P.; Jawad, S.; Seeley, A. E.; Swain, S.; Gangannagaripalli, J.
Show abstract
Background: Polypharmacy is common in people living with dementia (PLwD) and associated with adverse outcomes. Although Structured Medication Reviews (SMRs) are recommended to optimise medication regimens, their delivery is often constrained by limited healthcare resources. Artificial intelligence (AI) may support SMRs, yet little is known about how it is perceived by PLwD and their carers. This study explored their experiences of polypharmacy, views on SMRs, and attitudes towards use of AI tools in SMRs. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 12 PLwD experiencing polypharmacy and two focus groups with 14 carers were conducted via Microsoft Teams or telephone and analysed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Results: Two themes were constructed: experiences of SMRs, and attitudes towards AI in SMRs. Participants described challenges in managing polypharmacy, with carers often playing a central role in supporting adherence and monitoring side effects. Experiences of SMRs varied widely. SMRs were most valued when clinicians were empathetic and able to offer personalised guidance. Participants viewed AI use in SMRs positively, provided that such tools were well validated and used to assist rather than replace healthcare professionals. AI was viewed as having the potential to reduce administrative burden and support more person-centred care. However, some had concerns regarding patient safety and data security, highlighting the need for appropriate regulation and human oversight. Conclusion: Participants were supportive of AI use in SMRs, despite concerns about safety, data security and disclosure of AI use, and emphasised the importance of patient-clinician interactions and lived experience involvement in AI tool development.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Carers using assistive technology in dementia care: an explanatory sequential mixed methods study 97%
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 96%
- Needs of key stakeholders to make advance care plans and advance directives for people with dementia - A scoping review 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 96%
- A mixed-methods multi-site case study of a person-centred intervention for constant observation in hospitals with people living with dementia 96%
- Uncertainty in serious illness: A national interdisciplinary consensus exercise to identify clinical research priorities 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 94%
- Developing contents for a digital drug adherence tool with reminder cues and personalized feedback: a formative mixed-methods study among children and adolescents living with HIV in Tanzania 93%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the GRACE voice assistant for dementia care among caregivers and healthcare professionals: An interview study. 95%
- Validating a Clinical Decision Support System for Palliative Care using healthcare professionals’ insights 91%
- User Experience Evaluation of Cogscreen for Screening Mild Cognitive Impairment: Formative and Summative Evaluation 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: A qualitative study from the Process Evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia 96%
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 96%
- Process evaluation of a New psychosocial goal-setting and manualised support intervention for Independence in Dementia (NIDUS-Family) 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.