Back

Bathymetric Resolution-Dependent Biases in Antarctic Benthic Biodiversity Models: Hotspots Hold, Counts Shift

Potter, S.; Jansen, J.; Hill, N.; Lucieer, V.

2026-06-24 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.23.734136 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Antarctic benthic organisms are highly diverse and play a critical role in the Southern Ocean ecosystem. Despite decades of sampling, vast areas of the Antarctic continental shelf remain biologically unsurveyed due to logistical and financial constraints, limiting baseline knowledge essential for effective conservation planning. Species distribution models (SDMs) allow biodiversity to be inferred in the absence of biological data by linking benthic community patterns to environmental predictors. However, the resolution of the environmental predictors, particularly bathymetry, varies significantly between regions, casting doubt about how reliably SDMs can be used to predict into regions where only coarse-resolution data are available. Here, we show that SDMs trained on high-resolution data underestimate Antarctic benthic morphospecies richness by up to 18% when applied to aggregated coarse-resolution environmental data (and up to 50% when using satellite-derived ETOPO bathymetry). Using six systematically degraded versions of high-resolution multibeam bathymetry and annotated seafloor imagery across three Antarctic regions, we evaluate SDM performance both with and without additional environmental variables. High-resolution bathymetry captures terrain complexity most effectively, but we find that the spatial distribution of richness hotspots and the median richness per cell remain consistent, provided models are applied at the same resolution at which they were trained. Our results suggest that while high-resolution bathymetry may enhance local predictions, coarse-resolution data may be more robust for regional-scale predictions, such as those used for Antarctic shelf-wide spatial planning.

Matching journals

The top 12 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
3
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
4
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.7%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.3%
8
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.1%
11
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
12
Frontiers in Marine Science
62 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
13
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
15
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
16
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
17
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.3%
18
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
20
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
21
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
22
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
23
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
24
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
26
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.3%
27
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
29
Conservation Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
30
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%