Back

Can a Tissue-derived Progression Signature Accurately Predict Colorectal Cancer Stage Transitions in Blood?

Sarkar, P.; Sarkar, P.

2026-06-29 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.23.734006 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is challenging to track because its molecular changes are very complex as the disease progresses, creating significant challenges for robust biomarker discovery. In this study, we developed a machine learning framework by integrating monotonic progression and the StepMiner approach. We conducted external validation to identify reproducible, consistent transcriptomic biomarkers associated with CRC progression. Gene expression datasets were analyzed across four disease states from publicly available GEO: normal colon, adenoma, primary colorectal cancer, and metastasis. First, we identified genes with monotonic expression, then used the StepMiner approach to identify genes that act as switches between stages. A balanced 74-gene signature was used for machine-learning classification with a Random Forest. External validation showed strong performance in tissue-based datasets. However, tissue-derived signatures and plasma and blood-based datasets showed poor performance, highlighting biological differences between transcriptomic profiles. Cross-filtering between tissue-derived genes and blood expression datasets was performed, which resulted in the selection of 62 blood-compatible gene signatures. Leakage-free retraining on GSE164191 achieved a mean AUC of 0.868 with balanced precision. Functional enrichment analysis showed that these genes are highly active in cancer growth. Specifically, genes CBX3, S100A11, PDK4, NCOR1, and SOX4 demonstrated stable and reliable performance across the validation fold. Overall, our study presents a progression-aware transcriptomic framework for CRC biomarker discovery and demonstrates the importance of external validation. Additionally, we evaluate whether tissue-derived signatures can predict blood profiles. This proposed approach may help the future development of tissue-based diagnostics and minimally liquid-biopsy strategies for CRC. To ensure reproducibility, our proposed workflow was automated as a Nextflow pipeline. The tissue-derived model was deployed as an application utilizing Angular, ASP.NET Core, and Plumber (R).

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.0%
3
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.1%
4
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.1%
6
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
7
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
12
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
13
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
14
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
16
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
17
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
18
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
19
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
20
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
21
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
22
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
23
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
24
Life
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
25
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
26
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
27
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%