Back

Fluorescently guided workflow with rationally engineered 5' ligation adapters for high-sensitivity and low-bias small RNA sequencing

Barnes, S. A.; Lovisek, D.; Dzurcaninova, N.; Carnecky, M.; Birova, S.; Cirkova, I.; Matyasovsky, J.; Szobi, A.; Cekan, P.

2026-07-08 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.06.23.733996 bioRxiv
Show abstract

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) act as key regulators of gene expression across diverse cellular processes, and their precise quantification can provide unique insight into disease pathogenesis. High-throughput sequencing allows for comprehensive small RNA profiling; however, standard commercial library preparation workflows are challenged by issues of low sensitivity and representational bias, limiting reliable profiling, especially in scenarios where samples are scarce. Several structural studies have shown that this bias primarily arises due to sequence and secondary structure variations between miRNAs and adapters during enzyme-catalyzed biochemical reactions. In this work, we propose a new approach to ligation adapter engineering using a bioinformatic analysis of the human miRNome to rationally design structure-forcing 5 adapters, that physically override localized, unpredictable structural variations during the intermediate ligation state. We show that this approach combined with a practical fluorescence-guided workflow, utilizing a fluorescently-labeled 3 adapter and novel Fluorescent Ligation Rulers (FLRs) to guide precise band excision, can minimize representational bias and increase the sensitivity of small RNA sequencing from low-input biological matrices. In comprehensive benchmarks using a synthetic panel, this method significantly reduced bias and outperformed alternative commercial protocols. Finally, we demonstrate that this workflow enhances biomarker detection and library quality in challenging clinical matrices, especially in cerebrospinal fluid. Overall, this protocol enables highly accurate miRNome characterization and is well-suited for biomarker discovery in challenging sample types.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.4%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.1%
3
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
5
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.2%
6
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
8
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
11
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
12
SLAS Discovery
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.8%
14
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
15
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
16
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
17
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.4%
18
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
20
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
26
Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids
39 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
28
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
NAR Molecular Medicine
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
30
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%