Back

Minimizing methane emissions during the degradation of sewage sludge in a sulfate-rich bioreactor

Coon, G. R.; Jagoutz, O.; Bosak, T.

2026-06-23 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.23.733557 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Simultaneous removal of organic waste and industrial gypsum was assessed in continuous flow-through bioreactors that treat sulfate-rich sewage sludge. Metabolic fluxes, the composition of microbial communities, and profiles of organic matter in the presence of different organic loads were tracked over [~]190 days. The addition of a pre-enriched microbial community enhanced the rates of sulfate reduction during the establishment of the sludge blanket, but microbial diversity in established reactors depended primarily on organic loading. Organic removal rates were comparable to those in standard anaerobic digesters, but methane production accounted for [~]1% of electron flow compared to >70% in traditional systems. Stoichiometric analyses revealed that molar COD: sulfate ratios below [~]1 favored complete oxidation of acetate by sulfate-reducing bacteria (SRB) and those above [~]2.1 permitted either complete or incomplete oxidation, allowing sulfate reduction and methanogenesis to co-occur. Sequencing of the 16S rRNA confirmed these trends by revealing that the faster-growing SRB that do not oxidize acetate were more abundant at higher organic loads and during the establishment of the sludge blanket, whereas complete oxidizers became more abundant when the molar COD: sulfate ratio was [≤]3.2. In reactors that had been seeded with the pre-enriched communities, acetate-oxidizing SRB became prevalent over the incomplete oxidizers 25-50 days earlier. These results enable targeted design and control of microbial processes and bioreactors that remove waste organics and gypsum while producing less methane due to the competition for acetate between methanogenic archaea and SRB that oxidize acetate.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
21.6%
2
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.8%
3
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.2%
5
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
6
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.0%
8
Environmental Science: Water Research & Technology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
9
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
11
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
13
ACS ES&T Water
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
14
Bioresource Technology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
16
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
19
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.1%
20
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
21
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
22
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of Applied Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
24
FEMS Microbes
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Microbiology
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Chemical Engineering Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 45%
0.6%