Back

COMPASS: A Clinically-Optimized Multimodal Prediction Architecture with Survival Strategy for AD Prognosis

Liu, T.; Wu, Y.; Bao, Y.; Li, W.; Li, C.; Liu, Z.; Lin, G. N.

2026-06-26 radiology and imaging
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356398 medRxiv
Show abstract

Precise early diagnosis and progression prediction of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) are critical for optimizing clinical intervention. However, current methodologies often suffer from the passive utilization of clinical priors and rigid modal fusion strategies, failing to capture the heterogeneous variations of imaging biomarkers. Furthermore, predicting the precise time-to-conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to AD remains a formidable challenge. To address these limitations, we propose COMPASS, a clinical-guided multi-modal framework that unifies diagnosis with a comprehensive survival strategy. Specifically, we instigate a paradigm shift to "clinical-prior-driven" learning by incorporating Clinical-Guided Spatial Attention (CGSA), which actively transforms clinical states into visual signals to modulate neural focus on pathological regions. To bridge the semantic gap between modalities, we introduce Reciprocal Semantic Interaction (RSI) via cross-attention, while a Disease-Stage-Aware Modal Fusion (DSAMF) module dynamically adjusts modal weights based on inferred disease severity to mimic clinical reasoning. Moreover, we specifically design a Dual-Head Joint Survival Risk and Time Prediction Network (DH-Net) to jointly perform quantitative conversion time prediction and patient risk stratification. Extensive experiments demonstrate that COMPASS outperforms state-of-the-art methods, achieving 83.19% accuracy in pMCI vs. sMCI classification, an MAE of 7.96 months for conversion time prediction, and a C-index of 0.819. Furthermore, we conducted in-depth neurobiological interpretability analyses, revealing right hippocampal dominance and synergistic regional impairment patterns, thereby providing new biological insights for early AD diagnosis and subtype identification.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Nature Machine Intelligence
70 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.2%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 17%
10.0%
4
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.9%
6
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
8
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.5%
9
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.8%
11
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
12
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
13
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.5%
15
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
16
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
Nature Computational Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
20
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
22
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.6%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%