Back

Novel Drosophila cis-regulatory elements can be uncovered by footprinting transcription factor binding sites in ATAC-seq data

Mei, C.; Ness, J.; Nakai, K.; Wunderlich, Z.

2026-06-25 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.22.733832 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Developmental processes depend on carefully coordinated gene expression. Expression is modulated by the binding of transcription factors (TFs) to cis-regulatory elements (CREs), like enhancers and promoters. Many computational and experimental approaches have been developed to find CREs, particularly enhancers, in the genome, each with strengths and caveats. Given the increasing availability of ATAC-seq data and methods to find TF binding therein, we hypothesized that we could use TF footprinting tools to find clusters of TF binding events within accessible chromatin that may act as CREs. Using Drosophila anterior-posterior patterning network as a test bed, we used a digital genomic footprinting tool (DGT), TOBIAS, on previously published early embryo ATAC-seq data to characterize the TF footprint landscape of 16 TFs essential for embryonic patterning. Even in this system, with its extensive enhancer annotation, most footprinted TF binding sites lie outside of known enhancers, with intergenic and intronic regions hosting the highest TF footprint count, albeit at low density. To find potential novel enhancers, we identified high-density TF footprint clusters that are highly conserved and overlap with active enhancer histone mark signals. Five high confidence candidates were selected for reporter assay validation and all five were found to drive spatially patterned expression in the embryo. This study shows that even in a highly characterized system, the analysis of footprinted TF binding sites in ATAC-seq data can uncover new regulatory regions and suggests this approach may be helpful in using existing ATAC-seq data to find novel CREs. ARTICLE SUMMARYGiven the increasing availability of ATAC-seq datasets, workflows to exploit the data to uncover new cis-regulatory elements (CREs), including enhancers, are valuable. Using early anterior-posterior patterning in the Drosophila embryo as a test case, we find that previously published transcription factor footprinting tools and ATAC-seq data can be analyzed to yield new candidate CREs. Experimental validation confirms the activity of selected candidate CREs, suggesting that existing data can be analyzed to find novel regulatory elements.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
11.0%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.6%
3
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
9.6%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 11%
6.7%
5
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
6
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.0%
7
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.4%
10
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
11
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
13
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.4%
15
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
16
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
17
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
21
Gigabyte
62 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
22
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.9%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
24
Epigenetics & Chromatin
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.6%
25
BMC Genomic Data
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
26
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Methods
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%