Segmental Variability of Bolus-dispersion-induced Myocardial Blood Flow in Quantitative Myocardial Perfusion MRI: A CFD-based Analysis

BackgroundQuantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) enables estimation of myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR). These measurements require an arterial input function (AIF), which is typically derived from the left ventricular blood pool. However, the contrast agent bolus undergoes dispersion during transport through the coronary vasculature before reaching the myocardial microcirculation. This may introduce systematic and spatially heterogeneous errors in MBF and MPR estimates. PurposeThis work provides an extended segmental analysis of bolus-dispersion-induced errors in quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI using previously established computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations in realistic porcine coronary artery models. The focus of the present analysis is the assignment of coronary outlets to myocardial segments and the resulting segmental variability of MBF and MPR errors. MethodsRealistic three-dimensional models of the left and right coronary arteries were extracted from an ex-vivo porcine imaging cryomicrotome dataset. The models extended down to the pre-arteriolar level and included 364 outlets for the left coronary artery and 104 outlets for the right coronary artery, with an average outlet diameter of 383 {+/-} 85 {micro}m. Blood flow was simulated under rest and stress conditions using OpenFOAM. Contrast agent transport was then modeled by solving the advection-diffusion equation using a gamma-variate bolus as input. Outlet concentration-time curves were analyzed using an indicator-dilution model to estimate MBF and MPR errors. Outlets were assigned to standardized myocardial segments, and segmental averages were evaluated with respect to coronary supply territory and travel distance from the model inlet. ResultsThe simulations demonstrated marked segmental heterogeneity of volume blood flow and bolus-dispersion-induced MBF and MPR errors. Errors increased with travel distance from the coronary artery inlet and were more pronounced in regions supplied by the right coronary artery, consistent with lower flow velocities and stronger bolus dispersion. The resulting systematic errors led to underestimation of MBF and overestimation of MPR, with segmental deviations reaching up to approximately 60%. ConclusionBolus dispersion in the coronary vasculature may lead to substantial segmental and location-dependent errors in quantitative myocardial perfusion MRI. This extended analysis indicates that dispersion-related bias is not spatially uniform, but depends on coronary supply territory, travel distance, and flow conditions. These effects should be considered when interpreting regional MBF and MPR estimates, particularly as automated quantitative myocardial perfusion CMR becomes more widely used.