Back

Testing the waters of macrophyte biodiversity with multiscale spatial analysis of public lake monitoring data

Tseitlin, M.; Garcia-Giron, J.; Crabot, J.; Jiang, X.; Larkin, D. J.

2026-06-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.22.733670 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Freshwater monitoring programmes like the European Unions Water Framework Directive (WFD) provide a wealth of data on European lake status, including water quality and macrophytes (aquatic plants) as critical habitat features that support health of humans and wildlife. Easier WFD data access can enable external management and research to better safeguard human and natural freshwater use. We demonstrate a replicable workflow to easily download and process multi-year (2007-2024) observations of lake macrophytes (425 sites) and complementary water quality variables (202 sites) from Swedish WFD data. Then, we illustrate the value of improved data access to address ecological questions that drive conservation, investigating how spatial scales influence macrophyte richness and associated water quality relationships using a spatial random intercept model. Decomposing the spatial intercept links small scales (<10 km) to site-level gradients and large scales (>100 km) to biogeographical drivers. Stochastic and environmentally-structured processes coexisted at intermediate scales (10-100 km). Adding water quality rarely improved overall predictive performance of macrophyte diversity models but consistently influences the role of different spatial scales. Water quality variables showed consistent spatially structured variation at intermediate scales and unique spatial patterns in tandem, overlapping with large-scale biogeographical influences. Altogether, we show context-dependencies for spatial model interpretation and provide guidance in accounting for spatial confounding to improve inferential and predictive performance. Our workflow and results show a clear way forward for accessing high-quality macrophyte and water quality data sets and their utility for addressing ecological questions that guide macrophyte protection under the WFD. HighlightsO_LIyears Swedish of macrophyte and water quality monitoring data were extracted. C_LIO_LIrichness showed scale-specific patterns linked to geographic gradients. C_LIO_LIbest predictive models for richness had no water quality at all. C_LIO_LIoverlap in their spatial scales and must be carefully separated. C_LIO_LIpen access data and multiscale analysis can apply to many ecological questions. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.5%
2
Water Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.7%
3
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.1%
5
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
6
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
7
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
8
Ecological Indicators
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 28%
3.9%
10
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.1%
11
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.1%
12
FACETS
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.3%
14
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.1%
16
Communications Earth & Environment
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
Environmental DNA
56 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
18
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.6%
19
Limnology and Oceanography: Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
20
PLOS Water
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
22
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
23
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
24
Biological Conservation
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
25
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
26
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
ICES Journal of Marine Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
29
Journal of Biogeography
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Freshwater Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%