Digital exclusion and mental health in UK Armed Forces veterans: findings from the Veterans Digital Needs Study
Leightley, D.; Gillings, E.; Boering, P.; Dalrymple, K.; Curcin, V.; Marshall, I.; Greenberg, N.; Williamson, C.
Show abstract
Background: Public services are increasingly delivered through digital platforms. Although digital health may improve access and scalability, they may also widen inequalities for people who lack reliable access, confidence, skills, affordability or trust. Objective: This study examined the prevalence of self-reported digital exclusion among UK veterans and assessed its association with depression, anxiety and loneliness. Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was conducted between July 2025 and March 2026. Participants were UK Armed Forces veterans and resident in the UK. The survey collected sociodemographic, military service, digital access and health data. Self-reported digital exclusion was defined as reporting feeling excluded or disadvantaged due to lack of digital access or skills. Probable depression, anxiety and loneliness were assessed using the PHQ-2, GAD-2 and three-item UCLA Loneliness Scale, respectively. Associations between digital exclusion and each outcome were examined using adjusted multivariable logistic regression. Results: Of 1,911 responses received, 1,607 were included after data quality exclusions. Among participants with valid responses to the primary digital exclusion item, 553 (41.7%) reported digital exclusion. Digital exclusion was more common among females, younger veterans and those with lower household income. Probable depression, anxiety and loneliness were more prevalent among digitally excluded participants than among non-excluded participants. In adjusted models, self-reported digital exclusion was associated with higher odds of probable depression (AOR 1.38; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.83; p=0.028), probable anxiety (AOR 1.63, 95% CI 1.23 to 2.16; p<0.001), and probable loneliness (AOR 1.85; 95% CI 1.43 to 2.40; p<0.001). Conclusion: More than two-fifths of veterans with valid exposure data reported digital exclusion, despite high reported device access and confidence. Self-reported digital exclusion was associated with poorer mental health and loneliness, although causality cannot be inferred from these cross-sectional data. Digital-first services for veterans should include routine digital needs screening, targeted support and clear non-digital routes to care.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient and Staff Experiences of Video Consultations During COVID-19 in an English Outpatient Care Setting: Secondary Data Analysis of Routinely Collected Feedback Data 93%
- Individual factors influencing public’s perceptions about the importance of COVID-19 immunity certificates: a cross-sectional online questionnaire survey in the UK 93%
- Development and use analysis of ‘gestioemocional.cat’, a web app for promoting emotional self-care and access to professional mental health resources during the covid-19 pandemic 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Mental Health Service engagement changes during Covid-19 in children and young people across the UK: presenting concerns, service activity, and access by gender, ethnicity, and deprivation 95%
- Service user experiences and views regarding telemental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a co-produced framework analysis 93%
- Identifying subgroups with differential levels of service response to a digital screening and service navigation program for unmet social care needs 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Challenges in Implementing a Mobile AI Chatbot Intervention for Depression Among Youth on Psychiatric Waiting Lists: A Randomized Control Study Termination Report 92%
- Learning from the resilience of hospitals and their staff to the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review 90%
- The role of IT ambidexterity, digital dynamic capability and knowledge processes as enablers of patient agility: an empirical study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining Australian's beliefs, misconceptions, and sources of information for COVID-19: A national online survey 92%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 92%
- Factors associated with self-reported health among New Zealand military Veterans: a cross-sectional study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience of clinical services shapes attitudes to mental health data sharing: Findings from a UK-wide survey 93%
- The social media response to twice-weekly mass asymptomatic testing in England 92%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and well-being of people living with a long-term physical health condition: a qualitative study 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.