Back

Machine-Learning Model Identifies New Diagnostic Criteria for Beckwith-Wiedemann Spectrum

Adams, S. A.; Viswanathan, A.; Duki, B. T.; George, A. M.; Fahrner, J. A.; Stefanovski, D.; Cielo, C. M.; Kalish, J. M.

2026-07-01 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.06.22.26355886 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum (BWSp) is an overgrowth and cancer predisposition disorder caused by genetic and epigenetic alterations of chromosome 11p15. The 2018 international consensus produced a clinical scoring system to capture the phenotypic variability of BWSp and guide genetic testing and clinical management, including tumor screening, in patients without molecular confirmation. In this study, we evaluated BWSp predictors to identify the most informative features. Methods Supervised machine learning analyzed 25 phenotypic features in 555 patients with BWSp and 150 controls. Logistic regression, combined with a purposeful stepwise selection algorithm, identified a subset of features that can accurately classify subjects. Model performance was evaluated in a testing set and validated externally. Results The final model included six predictors: macroglossia, lateralized overgrowth, midface flattening, hepatomegaly, omphalocele, and developmental delay. Developmental delay was the only negative predictor; macroglossia (OR 46.10) and lateralized overgrowth (OR 27.87) were the strongest predictors. The proposed model and 2018 system did not differ in classification performance for testing (P = .39) or external (P = .15) sets. Conclusion A simplified diagnostic model, driven by macroglossia and lateralized overgrowth, differentiates between patients with BWSp and controls with performance comparable to the 2018 system. And may help physicians prioritize BWSp evaluation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.1%
2
Genetics in Medicine
78 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Journal of Medical Genetics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
4
European Journal of Human Genetics
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.5%
7
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
8
Human Mutation
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Pediatrics
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
10
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
11
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
12
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Human Genetics and Genomics Advances
84 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
15
Human Genomics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Human Genetics
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
17
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
18
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
19
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
20
Frontiers in Pediatrics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
21
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
The Journal of Pediatrics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.9%
25
The American Journal of Human Genetics
234 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Genetics in Medicine Open
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%